Try connecting a digital video camera to a 386 running at 25MHz and see what frame rate you can capture data at.
Such a system wouldn't even be able to reliably burn CDs.
The much faster CPUs have much smaller dies and are much more likely to be effected by electronic items including jammers and radar emissions...
Compatibility is not really an issue, but it will create bottlenecks and problems in processing.
what relationship does a video feed have to do with the onboard COP of a combat aircraft?
they're not burning CD's, they're using tactical data links which are are transporting data in bytes and kbytes
if you've ever seen military messaging for a weapons platform you should understand that the discussion about 64bit and milbuses is a lame example
TADL is not video gaming - no matter what the movies trot out
and those TADL's are going to literally hundreds of receivers.
the problem space is not about what the aircraft can receive to transmit - the problem space is about filtering
none of what you say is what is causing the warfighters grief.
btw you're also making claims about what LO aircraft can and can't do on some flawed assumptions (its not "stealth" either)
I'm curious as to where you obtained your info about what the F-22 or LO aircraft can do in a typical combat scenario - esp as none of the exercise data is in the public domain - let alone Blue Flag material
