gazzzwp
Member
With the political and humanitarian instability in Syria and the nuclear ambitions of Iran causing deep concern one would think that the US and Nato would be putting more weight behind some sort of intervention.
What I see in the media appears to be very much a watch and wait policy; there is obviously very much interest at the moment with the imminent arrival of the Russian Navy in Syria and what that might mean.
There is also very much speculation at the present time that the US wants or needs Russia on side with Middle East matters since the main US concern is actually China.
In this case, could the US be holding off a final deal on AMD as a kind of 'ace up their sleeve' to allow them to safely take their eye of the Middle East without fear of Russian interference and thereby devoting the bulk of their weight to the South China Sea arena?
What I see in the media appears to be very much a watch and wait policy; there is obviously very much interest at the moment with the imminent arrival of the Russian Navy in Syria and what that might mean.
There is also very much speculation at the present time that the US wants or needs Russia on side with Middle East matters since the main US concern is actually China.
In this case, could the US be holding off a final deal on AMD as a kind of 'ace up their sleeve' to allow them to safely take their eye of the Middle East without fear of Russian interference and thereby devoting the bulk of their weight to the South China Sea arena?