Challenging project, that. My suggestion would be to look up any relevant patents, just to get a feel for the concepts at work in a HUD. Call around and see if you can get a hold of a researcher or manufacturer. Obviously, they aren't likely to give you proprietary information, but they might be willing to help. And, if you can find one cheap, take it apart and try putting it back together.Good evening,
I was just wondering if you could give me some advice. These days I am dealing with HUD in a school project. The thing is that the HUD optics seems to be the most difficult part since I study electronics and computers at my uni. I would like to know where to find information how to construct it, which optical elements are need and so on? I would be very grateful for any helping information.
Kind regards
It is called a HUD because it is mounted so that you look through it to see your objective/target. If the beam splitter in a military HUD appears below eye level that is an illusion caused by the orientation of the pilots seat. The optimum firing position, for example, typically has the target centered in the HUD, which is also the primary sight.How does a HUD work? Does it work like an overhead projector, and projects an images onto the windscreen?
Also, most of the HUD I've seen in cockpits are positions below a pilot's eye-level. So, how can it be HEAD-UP display?
It's partly that, but its also something of a semi-unintentional safety feature. Most modern HUD screens are also slipstream-rated, so should the canopy fail, they offer some limited protection for the pilot's face.I do not believe that any design actually projects onto the canopy itself because of the problems with distortion from flexing and heating of the canopy.
It's partly that, but its also something of a semi-unintentional safety feature. The HUD screens is slipstream-rated, so should the canopy fail, it will not come loose and smash the pilot's head.It's partly that, but its also something of a semi-unintentional safety feature. Most modern HUD screens are also slipstream-rated, so should the canopy fail, they offer some limited protection for the pilot's face.
I think it has something to do with the complicated lens arrangement associated with trying to project something on a curve surface. The system will be so bulky that you may not have enough space to put a pilot into the cockpit.I do not believe that any design actually projects onto the canopy itself because of the problems with distortion from flexing and heating of the canopy.
Holographic HUDs are the new technology HUDs being introduced into military aircraft. Can any one eloberate on the technology ? Links to any white papers or detailed technical literature is most welcomeIt is called a HUD because it is mounted so that you look through it to see your objective/target. If the beam splitter in a military HUD appears below eye level that is an illusion caused by the orientation of the pilots seat. The optimum firing position, for example, typically has the target centered in the HUD, which is also the primary sight.
Basically A HUD uses the same technology as a teleprompter, an angled pane of ‘glass’ (it is actually much more complex than that, involving several layers of materials and/or optical coatings) called a beam splitter that combines 2 beams from perpendicular directions into 1. The projector is mounted below the beam splitter just behind the instrument console.
I do not believe that any design actually projects onto the canopy itself because of the problems with distortion from flexing and heating of the canopy.
Simply because they don't have a weapons that can properly utilized the advantage offered by the HMD. That change with R-73 and Phyton 4.Bit of history: HMDs have been around a bit longer than I thought, interesting that they have taken awhile to become prevalent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmet_mounted_display