Yet another example of why such articles shouldn't be written by journalists without technical background, the way cavitation is explained gives everyone with a basic thermodynamic education a headache.
Until here, he's right. Although one should add that the "suction" effect stems from the fact that due to mass conservation issues a low pressure area is created on the upper surface (what he calls "front surface") of the blade. And then...
Now this is explained stupidly, the real explanation being that water under low pressure simply starts boiling, it vaporizes. Those bubbles aren't vacuum bubbles, they're steam bubbles.
Therefore every effort to avoid cavitation revolves around how to avoid any blade areas entering critical pressure/temperature regimes.
This certainly has got to with speed, but I could design you a blade that cavitates at very, very low speeds.