OMFG no offense but do u guys live under a rock
i mean none of u gave sources about where you get your info, do you?
No, I don't live under a rock, but lets look at a few facts the shall we? Gulf War 2, the 300,000 odd coalition forces faced Saddams 375,000 troops (out of 538,000 combatants). The war essentially lasted 3 weeks, the coalition lost 139 KIA, Iraq lost somewhere between 7,600 - 45,000 depending on what source you believe. So here we have recent proof that the US military can comprehensively defeat an equally sized adversary. The equipment the Iraqi's used would be comparable to the North Korean equipment. You are the one making outlandish claims, the onus is on you to provide proof.
but i guess u beleive each other because most of the post is like north korea armyy is crap.
Nobody has said that. But when compared to an advanced networked military such as the US or the South Korean army the North Korean Army is going to look a tad less than impressive.
etx American can take on the world in conventional warfare and win and still a rag tag insurgency is giving your trouble
Yes, simply because it is the most difficult form of warfare to 'win'. The type of battle being discussed on this board is conventional warfare - given that the US seems quite adept at winning that type of battle (Guf war I, Gulf War II), your remarks are not relevant.
u know what lets leave it as this America is the best they can beat everyone the ranger,navy seals and green berets have the best training and equipment in the world they have the best aircraft.
Actually I don't agree. I believe there are other nations that have superior trained if not equipped militaries (then again I may be biassed being an Aussie) - but you cannot argue that the US defence forces are not the most potent military on the planet given their size, equipment and the fact they are relatively well trained.
also i don't care if i last long here this is not something necessary in the life i won't lose any sleep over it.
All we are asking for is that you substatiate your claims... Is that so hard?
once what i say is too good to be true for you guys it is usually fake i have a daily briefing on north korea every day thats how i know what i know maybe you are receiving royalties from the west
Daily briefing from whom? What nationality are you? Where do yu live? Are you in the military? I am not receiving 'royalties', but I do have a defence background, and have taken particular interest in the Korean war as I used to be part of Kapyong Company at Duntroon.
North korean soilder are more disciplined that USA and ROK thats a fact
Possibly - discipline is not the be all and end all of soldiering. There is also the small matters of training, morale, equipment etc. Sometimes you need to know when to disobey an order to be a more effective sodier.
i am just trying to open up your tunnel vision that you have but most people here like to live with the fantasy that USA is the strongest but if a war was to break out then i guess you guys would be surprised you anticipate too much
And Saddam said much the same I believe in the early days of 2003. Then they pulled him out of a hole in the ground 9 months later where he had been living like a rat.
The thing about forums is that hardly anyone who knows the subject actually posts
you sure your a Defense Professional / Analyst i highly doubt it you don't show the characteristics of a Defense Professional / Analyst you assume way to much
There are quite a few who are defence professionals on this board. There are topics which they cannot elaborate on and those they can. So far the professionals haven't taken your side. If you are a defence professional, PM one of the moderators with evidence and they will change your status and be able to tell us that perhaps you are not a 13 year old fanboi and that you do have the credentials to back your assertations..
