The F-16 replacement of the Royal Netherlands Airforce.

longbow

New Member
AndiPandi

Very interesting.

With JSF surposedly priced at 200M dollars, Gripen should have an increasing chance,
I mean, in my country paying 1.1 billion DKr for one airplane that the defense has a really hard time convincing the public that we really need, is probably not going to go down well with the ordinary man.

Though I fear that the generals and current goverment has made up their mind, so gripen's best chance is probably with the national audit and public oppinion.
200M??? This sounds like the Norway-deal all over, when the press compared the TCO cost of the F-35 to the unit price of the Gripen.. :confused:
 

Grand Danois

Entertainer
AndiPandi

Very interesting.

With JSF surposedly priced at 200M dollars, Gripen should have an increasing chance,
I mean, in my country paying 1.1 billion DKr for one airplane that the defense has a really hard time convincing the public that we really need, is probably not going to go down well with the ordinary man.

Though I fear that the generals and current goverment has made up their mind, so gripen's best chance is probably with the national audit and public oppinion.
About 56 million USD fly-away - 200 million AUD is LRIP package UPC and introduction into service plus a lot of infrastructure (tools, shops, training, basing, personnel salaries, etc.)

This is "standard practice" in Australia, I refer you to the Shornet deal.

Official SAAB Gripen NG fly-away is 55 million USD (2008). This price may include some extra items though, can't remember everything. ;)
 

IPA35

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #44
4.8 + 4.8 = 9.6/85= Gripen TCO.
Unless this package is incomplete...


Also, how long will the block 60 or the Gripen stay effective in modern combat?
The Australians want to replace their newly ordered SH's in the 2020's already, I hope the planes that we would buy in this scenario will have a longer lifespan?


Anyone knows the F-35 TCO package includes maintainance by LM personell?
I prefer not to privatise the military TBH.
 

Grand Danois

Entertainer
4.8 + 4.8 = 9.6/85= Gripen TCO.
Unless this package is incomplete...


Also, how long will the block 60 or the Gripen stay effective in modern combat?
The Australians want to replace their newly ordered SH's in the 2020's already, I hope the planes that we would buy in this scenario will have a longer lifespan?
The aircraft manufacturer can't really calculate a TCO - this is for the customer to do, as it includes many items unrelated to the manufacturer ( typically more than half the TCO).
 

longbow

New Member
Also, the Gripen-price is far from complete - the devil is in the details! It includes some spare parts, but not all the spare parts needed through the lifespan, and certainly not the needed updates, like a MLU-kit. It is NOT a representative TCO prize.
 

Grand Danois

Entertainer
Also, the Gripen-price is far from complete - the devil is in the details! It includes some spare parts, but not all the spare parts needed through the lifespan, and certainly not the needed updates, like a MLU-kit. It is NOT a representative TCO prize.
Some of it was guaranteed by the Swedish Govt, though. But it's hard to get smart on these things since how a package is priced and what is included is rarely transparent!!!
 

IPA35

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #48
I believe SAAB said it was a complete package, I'll try to find the source later today.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
The Australians want to replace their newly ordered SH's in the 2020's already, I hope the planes that we would buy in this scenario will have a longer lifespan?
They're being replaced in 2025 because they were only ever regarded as an interim buy. They will end up back with the USN or if not then the State Dept will hold them over for someone else to use under an FMS deal. They will not be at their "use by date" by a long shot.

The Shornets were always intended to be stop gaps just in case the JSF was delayed and also to enable us to maintain combat capability for other doctrinal demands whilst the new ORBAT was defined and grew.
 

Palnatoke

Banned Member
They're being replaced in 2025 because they were only ever regarded as an interim buy. They will end up back with the USN or if not then the State Dept will hold them over for someone else to use under an FMS deal. They will not be at their "use by date" by a long shot.

The Shornets were always intended to be stop gaps just in case the JSF was delayed and also to enable us to maintain combat capability for other doctrinal demands whilst the new ORBAT was defined and grew.
Are you guys printing money or do they just grow on those eucalyptus trees???
 

zeven

New Member
Really? How so? AFAIK the block 60 out performs the Gripen in almost every PI, INCLUDING cost.
Really? Now i've been looking for hours to find some kind of source that support this claim. can't find it, will you please provide me with it or some information? and is F-16 block 60 superior to all Euro/canards or is it just Gripen that is inferior to everything els??
 
Last edited:

zeven

New Member
Also, the Gripen-price is far from complete - the devil is in the details! It includes some spare parts, but not all the spare parts needed through the lifespan, and certainly not the needed updates, like a MLU-kit. It is NOT a representative TCO prize.
Incorrect, the offer includes a COMPLETE package supported by the swedish government.
 

longbow

New Member
Incorrect, the offer includes a COMPLETE package supported by the swedish government.
Really? Now i've been looking for hours to find some kind of source that support this claim. can't find it, will you please provide me with it or someinformation?
 

longbow

New Member
Yes... but... :) It depends on what you consider to be the complete package. The offer contains nothing about the future upgrades (that could prove to be so expensive if the Gripen turns out to be an orphan) - because it is not included in the offer. Neither is all the needed spares included in the offer. To say that Saab has offered RNLAF a fixed TCO-price is a misconception of the offer.
 

gripen39

New Member
Also, the Gripen-price is far from complete - the devil is in the details! It includes some spare parts, but not all the spare parts needed through the lifespan, and certainly not the needed updates, like a MLU-kit. It is NOT a representative TCO prize.
Far from complete?? FAR?? where is your source? it is a all inclusive package
I.m not saying that gripen is the better fighter but lets stay to known facts!
and spares are included ;)

Gripen - The wings of your nation - Gripen NG Fighters for The Netherlands
 
Last edited:

longbow

New Member
Far from complete?? FAR?? where is your source? it is a all inclusive package
I.m not saying that gripen is the better fighter but lets stay to known facts!


Gripen - The wings of your nation - Gripen NG Fighters for The Netherlands
Saab does its best to make their offer seem like a fixed definitive (and cheap) offer, as oposed to the "LM does not even say what the F-35 will cost" - This equates to something like: Gripen - Fixed low cost - F-35 - Unknown, possibly high cost. I don't blame anyone if they believe that the Gripen represents a fixed price - Saab has obviously learnt their lesson from the Norway-deal, and are doing their best to regain their "cheap&capable-image". The problem is, the package can not be complete if it does not say anything about the upgrades. The price of the upgrades are high, and the dutch should know this from the MLU, and Saab is in no position to make any guarantes on the price of the upgrades that the dutch might want 20 years from now.
 

Todjaeger

Potstirrer
FYI
/delta2005
AND

Far from complete?? FAR?? where is your source? it is a all inclusive package
I.m not saying that gripen is the better fighter but lets stay to known facts!
and spares are included ;)

Gripen - The wings of your nation - Gripen NG Fighters for The Netherlands
Have looked at both linked items. Having read through both of them, they IMO far from being 'complete' packages.

The first link, provided by delta2005 seems to be missing the following types of systems.
Targeting pods not included, and no mention of what pods, if any, will be already integrated for use by the Gripen NG
Any DAS (Danger Awareness System)
EWSP
What muntions are integrated with the Gripen NG?
Who pays for future weapons integration onto the platform?
What sort of datalinks included and what/who do they interact with?

The second link, provided by gripen39 also does not answer many of these questions.
It lists 'EW systems' but neglects to identify what types of EW systems are included with the offer. These 'EW systems' may or may not include many of the ones I listed above. It also lists several types of air to air missiles which will apparently be able to be used from the Gripen NG, though it does not specifically state that. It does however neglect to say anything about any air to ground munitions. Lastly, it states that the Gripen NG will be able to use the Gripen datalink, but neglects to mention if the offer includes any datalinks which would be compatible and interoperable with the rest of NATO.

In short, the offers either omitted a number of items which would be included as part of the 'complete' package or the offers were not in fact for a complete package.

-Cheers
 

IPA35

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #59
Does the F-35 price include all that?

And why would they pay for weapons?
 
Top