okey, I'm sorry if I'm going over something that has already been said but I'm new and didn't want to read 7 pages of posts so here it is-
Counter-insurgency is mainly a popularity contest. Whoever the public believes to be the greater side (either monitarily or more likely morally) usually can persist longer. Don't believe it. Try running a major U.S. based insurgency. You can have the exact same weapons, and yet you will not last these years as in the Iraq War. The American population will see you as a murderous thug like force and you will not last long. However this isn't the question. It's moving Iraq that is the real problem.
Iraq could have been (mostly) avoided from the begining. Lifting Saddom made it possible for a religious war. However we could have avoided being the "bad guy". Remember the topling of all the Saddom statues? At that time, Americans seemed pretty good in Iraq. We were the heroes. However this was the time when we first screwed up. Basic needs such as power and fuel were pretty weak. Iraqis just had a sudden lose of style of living. Also we decided to disband the Iraqi army. We had officially let lose a trained military force on the streets. With nowhere to for work, where would you think they would go? Even better, instead of fighting for Saddom, they get to fight for Allah. What with this means (depending on how zealous/extreme) they were able to go farther with what they do. Death is nothing if you are doing it for God and taking out 'infidels while doing it.
While all this is happening, Americans are finding it fun to stick to their fortress like bases. When they do leave the base, they stick to their heavily armored vehicles. Just imagine what this says to the population. Hey! We just liberated you, but we really don't like you that much either. We intentionally isolated ourselves! Now I have already said living conditions were going down in the cities. With only one real voice - the ones of militant jihadist - Americans soon look like the terrible person in this whole ordeal.
So now we find ourselves being shot at by insurgents. It gets even better when the age old Sunni/Shiite conflict restarts (big suprise on that one) which brings more fighters in to the picture. Yet our Arab friends have a new trick in store for us (or a used old one).
Bombs seem to be the weapons of choice for insurgents. IEDs were first used by Afghanese against the Soviets and suicide bombers where first widely used by Lebanese Hezbollah. With Americans sticking to Hum-Vs, a cleverly placed IED can get many casualties.
Bombs also make a psycological affect. With Western media ready to show whatever happens in conflict zones. One hidden IED or insane suicide bomber can make the evening news. Your affecting the minds of Americans back home with that.
The other tactic used by insurgents is sudden, quick attacks, hiding behind the local populis. Sounds unfair? Well we have a mostly untrained force with lesser weapons going against the strongest army in the world. Seems a bit lopsided. We went in not knowing much about them, yet they knew us (another starting problem not listed earlier (I think)). Eastern troops have shown that they like to use deception and suprise to fight. Remember Vietnam? This is one of the main points in Sun Tzu's 'Art of War'.
Well so far I've only said what we did wrong, but I don't like to be negative. What should we have done for future reference is the best move from here (and also finishing up with Iraq )
From what I have said, I have some key points that must be said in order to combat insurgencies-
1. We must know our population. Customs, culture, everything! Our ignorance is not a good excuse for anything.
2. We must make sure the standerd of living does nothing but improve. Lowering this only pisses off the population. (Give basic needs)
3. Make the population love your soldiers, this can be done in a number of ways
-1- Soldiers must be in the street. The population must know them. Make neighborhoods be the patrol sections of a select group of soldiers. These select soldiers will start to be like neighbors themselves with that populis.
-2- All good things given by the U.S. government should be seen to be given by the troops. Make a show out of it! Let everyone around know that the troops are installing generators somewhere!
-3- Find out which U.S. soldiers are Muslum. Then send them to pray in the Mosques. Become active members. This will mean they can help some possible insurgents not join the fight. Another way of making it unfavorable because they would be shooting at a friendly face.
4.Condemn suicide attacks religiously. This means getting clerics to say that it is bad to kill a soldier or blow yourself up. Take control of the media around there and broadcast these sort of condemning speechs from loud speakers.
5.Get local international support. Its easier to fight this sort of war if local countries support you.
6.Make sure your infantry kicks ass. Ours already does. But train for these sort of thing.
7.While improving the country, slowly give control to a WORKING local government. Also the Iraqi army should be the one seen doing the real work eventually. It makes people think it is their country again. Along with this, have the government help with reconstruction. Oil is expensive. Revenues from that can help their own society.
With these things in mind (and prolly some stuff I've missed) the U.S. could do well vs this form of an opponent. Its really just a very different war then the U.S. is used to. We must not be like the French and learn from history. I think Patreas (however you spell it) its doing a great job over their. Theres my two cents. Questions? Comments? Plz ask!
Counter-insurgency is mainly a popularity contest. Whoever the public believes to be the greater side (either monitarily or more likely morally) usually can persist longer. Don't believe it. Try running a major U.S. based insurgency. You can have the exact same weapons, and yet you will not last these years as in the Iraq War. The American population will see you as a murderous thug like force and you will not last long. However this isn't the question. It's moving Iraq that is the real problem.
Iraq could have been (mostly) avoided from the begining. Lifting Saddom made it possible for a religious war. However we could have avoided being the "bad guy". Remember the topling of all the Saddom statues? At that time, Americans seemed pretty good in Iraq. We were the heroes. However this was the time when we first screwed up. Basic needs such as power and fuel were pretty weak. Iraqis just had a sudden lose of style of living. Also we decided to disband the Iraqi army. We had officially let lose a trained military force on the streets. With nowhere to for work, where would you think they would go? Even better, instead of fighting for Saddom, they get to fight for Allah. What with this means (depending on how zealous/extreme) they were able to go farther with what they do. Death is nothing if you are doing it for God and taking out 'infidels while doing it.
While all this is happening, Americans are finding it fun to stick to their fortress like bases. When they do leave the base, they stick to their heavily armored vehicles. Just imagine what this says to the population. Hey! We just liberated you, but we really don't like you that much either. We intentionally isolated ourselves! Now I have already said living conditions were going down in the cities. With only one real voice - the ones of militant jihadist - Americans soon look like the terrible person in this whole ordeal.
So now we find ourselves being shot at by insurgents. It gets even better when the age old Sunni/Shiite conflict restarts (big suprise on that one) which brings more fighters in to the picture. Yet our Arab friends have a new trick in store for us (or a used old one).
Bombs seem to be the weapons of choice for insurgents. IEDs were first used by Afghanese against the Soviets and suicide bombers where first widely used by Lebanese Hezbollah. With Americans sticking to Hum-Vs, a cleverly placed IED can get many casualties.
Bombs also make a psycological affect. With Western media ready to show whatever happens in conflict zones. One hidden IED or insane suicide bomber can make the evening news. Your affecting the minds of Americans back home with that.
The other tactic used by insurgents is sudden, quick attacks, hiding behind the local populis. Sounds unfair? Well we have a mostly untrained force with lesser weapons going against the strongest army in the world. Seems a bit lopsided. We went in not knowing much about them, yet they knew us (another starting problem not listed earlier (I think)). Eastern troops have shown that they like to use deception and suprise to fight. Remember Vietnam? This is one of the main points in Sun Tzu's 'Art of War'.
Well so far I've only said what we did wrong, but I don't like to be negative. What should we have done for future reference is the best move from here (and also finishing up with Iraq )
From what I have said, I have some key points that must be said in order to combat insurgencies-
1. We must know our population. Customs, culture, everything! Our ignorance is not a good excuse for anything.
2. We must make sure the standerd of living does nothing but improve. Lowering this only pisses off the population. (Give basic needs)
3. Make the population love your soldiers, this can be done in a number of ways
-1- Soldiers must be in the street. The population must know them. Make neighborhoods be the patrol sections of a select group of soldiers. These select soldiers will start to be like neighbors themselves with that populis.
-2- All good things given by the U.S. government should be seen to be given by the troops. Make a show out of it! Let everyone around know that the troops are installing generators somewhere!
-3- Find out which U.S. soldiers are Muslum. Then send them to pray in the Mosques. Become active members. This will mean they can help some possible insurgents not join the fight. Another way of making it unfavorable because they would be shooting at a friendly face.
4.Condemn suicide attacks religiously. This means getting clerics to say that it is bad to kill a soldier or blow yourself up. Take control of the media around there and broadcast these sort of condemning speechs from loud speakers.
5.Get local international support. Its easier to fight this sort of war if local countries support you.
6.Make sure your infantry kicks ass. Ours already does. But train for these sort of thing.
7.While improving the country, slowly give control to a WORKING local government. Also the Iraqi army should be the one seen doing the real work eventually. It makes people think it is their country again. Along with this, have the government help with reconstruction. Oil is expensive. Revenues from that can help their own society.
With these things in mind (and prolly some stuff I've missed) the U.S. could do well vs this form of an opponent. Its really just a very different war then the U.S. is used to. We must not be like the French and learn from history. I think Patreas (however you spell it) its doing a great job over their. Theres my two cents. Questions? Comments? Plz ask!