Project Pluto: Nuclear powered unmanned bomber

AegisFC

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Their was nothing simple or even really ethical about Project Pluto. The more I read about it, the happier I am that it was never built.

Pluto's designers calculated that its shock wave alone might kill people on the ground. Then there was the problem of fallout. In addition to gamma and neutron radiation from the unshielded reactor, Pluto's nuclear ramjet would spew fission fragments out in its exhaust as it flew by.
But what drove the last nail into Pluto's coffin was a question so deceptively simple that the wizards at the lab might be excused for deliberately overlooking it: Where do you flight-test a nuclear reactor? "How are you going to convince people that it is not going to get away and run at low level through Las Vegas -- or even Los Angeles?" asks Jim Hadley, a Livermore physicist and Pluto alumnus who now works on detecting foreign nuclear tests for the lab's hush-hush Z Division. There was, admits Hadley, no way of guaranteeing that Pluto would not become a nuclear-powered juggernaut beyond its inventors' control -- a kind of airborne Frankenstein, a flying Chernobyl.

One proposed solution was to tie Pluto to a long tether in Nevada. ("That would have been some tether," Hadley observes dryly.) A more realistic alternative was to fly Pluto in figure eights near Wake Island, a U.S. territory in the Pacific, then bury the "hot" missile in 20,000 feet of ocean. Even at a time when the AEC was trying to get the public to think of radiation in terms of "sunshine units," the proposed dumping of scores of contaminated missiles in the Pacific was enough to give people pause.
Only in the 1950's and 60's could something so insane be thought up and attempted, thank goodness rationality prevailed.
 

Salty Dog

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
So Merkle asked a Colorado-based porcelain company named Coors to manufacture ceramic fuel elements that could stand the heat and provide even temperature distribution in the reactor.

The centerpiece of the Pluto effort, the Tory reactor was designed to be durable but compact enough to fly. The company is well known today for a much different product: while making ceramic-lined vats for breweries around the country, Adolph Coors realized that he might be in the wrong business. Although the Coors Porcelain Company continued to make porcelain -- including all of the nearly 500,000 pencil-shaped fuel elements used in the Tory reactor -- the brewery Adolph Coors opened near his ceramics factory soon became the tail that wagged the dog.
A nice piece of trivia from the the article for Coors drinkers.

The B-36 airframe was planned for an atomic-powered concept demonstrator aircraft, the X-6, was planned for the B-36 airframe, and one (dubbed the NB-36H) actually carried a nuclear reactor aloft for test purposes.
Looks like a nuclear reactor was actually carried aloft by the USAF.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
Pluto's designers calculated that its shock wave alone might kill people on the ground. Then there was the problem of fallout. In addition to gamma and neutron radiation from the unshielded reactor, Pluto's nuclear ramjet would spew fission fragments out in its exhaust as it flew by.
Exactly my fears of nuclear powered aircrafts. But may be a good deterrent for aircraft being shot down by enemy in his own territory (LOL). On the serious side, anyone trying to inflict damage on the country with nuclear powered aircrafts would probably only attempt to destroy those aircrafts.

This thing also reminds of an Argentinian project which turned out be a fars.
 
Top