- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #61
The Nelson factor had a big impact on British Naval thinking up to WW1. Historically the RN believed in weight (big guns) and speed of broadsides, the same as they did during the Napoleonic wars (RN ships on average fired two broadsides for a French Man-o-Wars one, they also carried carronades, the French didn't). This is a contributing factor why the RN vessels at Jutland stacked shells and cordite in their turrets and left the lift fire-doors open to increase the speed of reloading and subsequently broadside rates. Germany, thanks to good old Carl Zueiss focused on accuracy and traded larger guns for heavier armour plate.
Beatty lost his 'fast cat' Battle Cruisers at Jutland because he failed to use their design advantage - speed and big guns which could out range most German Dreadnoughts. The philosophy of the design being to stand-off and hammer your adversary before they can get in range, hence the reason for sacrificing armour plate for bigger guns and speed. His huge ego and thirst for glory resulted in him taking his ships within range of the much more heavily armoured German ships!
Two must read books, which discuss these factors in depth are:
Robert K. Massies 'Dreadnought' and 'Castles of Steel'
I will check those books, ( a good reading list from this forum )
A few days ago there was a documentary about a joint Canadian US exercise where they sank an old Canadian Frigate with gun fire ( 5" guns). One of the Commanders observing the exercise commented that the Frigate would be in serious trouble if one of the 5" shells hit the VLS launcher meaning the ship would probably blow up. Do you think a direct shell or missile hit would cause that? ( Same effect of hitting ammunition store area of WWII era ships I guess)