Kosovo=Serbia you said to me in your post:
"And I can only say next:
Are you take your medication this morning , or you are on dope or something
stronger." You should learn not to personally attack someone who gives you credit to discuss an issue. Otherwise you prove you are not worth it.
And followed on with:
"When you sober and realize what you have wrote, I hope you will edit...(what you wrote)": Like i explained before i dont consume alcohol or other addictive substances, it is you who should consider sobering up from hundreds of years of drunkeness and racism, as you boast about your Serbian "superiority" in your following lines
:"(We have a)...big "slavic" hart, crazy "slavic" mind, strong shljivovitza and votka cocktail, and same strong orthodox faith."
You try to mock all cultures and nations in your posts that you think are "enemies" of "Great Serbia" dream in your previous posts. Inpost #108 you talk about how Serbia will
"squash Albanians like a bug" and how all Nato countries can east shit
"And if NATO try to eat shiitt again, then they will" in your words. Even your chosen nick "Kosovo=Serbia" shows your aims and ambitions and agressive stance on your "racial superiority" claiming an independent country as yours.
And in your post #118 you tell us to read Serbian writers/politicians like Milovan Drecun Drugi, Ivo Andric, Vuk Draskovic, Grigorije Božović to learn how "Great Serbian is", these names that you give hold onto ultra-nationalistic beliefs and superiority of Serbs, their actions and words fuelled the racial conflict and ethnic cleansing [/B]of anyone not Serb by Serbs we saw a decade ago in the Balkans.
And you admit that you dont know much about Albanian history in your own words in post #118 with
"I dont know much about Albanian history only what I learn from history books, and heard from grandpa, friends, and etc....". Well if this is your only source of information on the people you share a neighbourhood with, no wonder you try to kill and destroy anything that is different than you.
You once again arrogantly take a simple view to fuel your hatred against anything and everything that isnt "pro-Great Serbian" in your following words:
"Bastardized during hundreds of years by who knows who, Ottomans penholders for 500 years, kill thousands Serbian soldiers and civilians in WW1 " forgetting and perhaps boasting in your nationalism about the 2 million Bosnian, Croation, Macedonian, Albanian and Turkish people Serbia butchered, raped, injured and displaced during the Bosnia ethnic cleansing effort, and this in 1992-95 years. Not hundreds and hundreds of years ago.
Because, your
"Great Serbia! we are best, we big slavic heart! we crazy slavic mind! we drink votka! we rule!!!" attitude is not and will not bring peace to the region. And I resent you are not alone with such an outlook in the Serbian nation.
You dont have to love everyone, but I think alot more respect and fairness when dealing with others, even those you see as your enemy is needed, of course that needs self-honour.
Sure, love and be patriotic about your country, everyone should, but dont only rely on ulltra-nationalistic/racist ideologies and opinions, that wont make you a better man or a country. I highly recommend you start expanding your source of information, on matters relating to history and the people you share a neighbourhood with, including Albanians, Bosnians, Macedonians and Turks.
Heres something on our perspective for you to start with, from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_Empire
"One of the successes of the social structure of the Ottoman Empire was the
unity that it brought about among its
highly varied populations through an organization named as millets.
The Millets were the major religious groups that were
allowed to establish their own communities under Ottoman rule. The Millets were established by
retaining their own religious laws, traditions, and language under the general protection of the sultan.
Plurality was the key to the longevity of the Empire.
Ultimately, the Ottoman Empire's relatively
high degree of tolerance for ethnic differences proved to be one of its greatest strengths in integrating the new regions but this
non-assimilative policy became a weakness after the rise of
nationalism.
The dissolution of the empire based on ethnic differentiation (balkanization) brought the final end which the failed Ottomanism among the citizens and participatory politics of the first or the constitutional Era had
successfully addressed.
The Ottoman Empire was, in principle,
tolerant towards Christians and Jews (the "Ahl Al-Kitab", or "People of the Book", according to the Qu'ran).
Under the millet system, non-Muslim people were considered subjects of the empire, but were
not subject to the Muslim faith or Muslim law. The Orthodox millet, for instance, was still officially legally subject to
Justinian's Code, which had been in effect in the Byzantine Empire for 900 years. Also, as the largest group of non-Muslim subjects (or zimmi) of the Islamic Ottoman state, the Orthodox millet was
granted a number of special privileges in the fields of politics and commerce, in addition to having to pay higher taxes than Muslim subjects.
The Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II allowed the local Christians to
stay in Constantinople (Istanbul) after conquering the city in 1453, and to
retain their institutions such as the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate.
In 1461 Sultan Mehmed II
established the Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople. Previously, the Byzantines considered the Armenian Church as heretical and thus did not allow them to build churches inside the walls of Constantinople.
In 1492, when the Muslims and Sephardic Jews were expelled from Spain during the Spanish Inquisition, the Ottoman Sultan Bayezid II sent his fleet under Kemal Reis to
save them and granted the refugees the right to settle in the Ottoman Empire.
The state's relationship with the Greek Orthodox Church was
largely peaceful, and recurrent oppressive measures taken against the Greek church were a deviation from generally established practice. T
he church's structure was kept intact and largely
left alone but under close control and scrutiny until the Greek War of Independence of 1821–1831 and, later in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the rise of the Ottoman constitutional monarchy, which was driven to some extent by nationalistic currents, tried to be balanced with Ottomanism.
Other Orthodox churches, like the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, were dissolved and placed under the jurisdiction of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate; until Sultan Abdülaziz established the Bulgarian Exarchate in 1870 and reinstated the autonomy of the Bulgarian Church.
Similar millets were established for the Ottoman Jewish community, who were under the authority of the Haham Başı or Ottoman Chief Rabbi; the Armenian Orthodox community, who were under the authority of a head bishop; and a number of other religious communities as well.
Ottoman legal system accepted the Religious law over its subjects. The Ottoman Empire was always organized around a system of local jurisprudence.
Legal administration in the Ottoman Empire was part of a larger scheme of balancing central and local authority.Ottoman power revolved crucially around the administration of the rights to land, which gave a space for the
local authority develop the needs of the local millet. The jurisdictional complexity of the Ottoman Empire
was aimed to permit the integration of culturally and religiously different groups.
The Ottoman system had
three court systems: one for Muslims, one for non-Muslims, involving appointed Jews and Christians ruling over their respective religious communities, and the "trade court". "
Peace and Respect,
Cheers.
.......