Well I guess what I am asking are two things here...
1) Are hovercraft's still viable as a weapons or transportation platforms?
2) Would it also be viable to modify a Russian Zubr Class with say two more powerful engines and ditch the third one..
Replace the CIWS with RAM's and add a phalnax up the top just in case replace the rockets with two batteries of RAM's with say hydra 70's... and add a Mk41 VLS.
Modernize the crafts radar fire control etc...Redesign the hull to use trimaran technology as well as the rubber for example it could travel with the three hulls with the rubber sucked up close to the hull then it could go in for a landing with the rubber fully inflated..
Would this be a good heavy assault craft.
(oh I am still talking same transport capability ie. 3 MBTs or 500 troops etc.)
1) Are hovercraft's still viable as a weapons or transportation platforms?
2) Would it also be viable to modify a Russian Zubr Class with say two more powerful engines and ditch the third one..
Replace the CIWS with RAM's and add a phalnax up the top just in case replace the rockets with two batteries of RAM's with say hydra 70's... and add a Mk41 VLS.
Modernize the crafts radar fire control etc...Redesign the hull to use trimaran technology as well as the rubber for example it could travel with the three hulls with the rubber sucked up close to the hull then it could go in for a landing with the rubber fully inflated..
Would this be a good heavy assault craft.
(oh I am still talking same transport capability ie. 3 MBTs or 500 troops etc.)