Philippines buying 18 new SF 260s, possibly 34 'Mescaleros'

drg

New Member
Just reading the latest AFM, and in it, the mag claims that the Philippines has signed agreement with Alenia Aermacchi for 18 new SF 260s, and the Air Force may also buy 34 second-hand 'Mescaleros' (sorry dont know a thing about 'em), from South Korea.
 

contedicavour

New Member
Good news. However I'm still wondering why the US doesn't provide some second hand former ANG F16s to provide the Philippines with some air defence after the last F5s were retired. It's not like the area were devoid of any threat :rolleyes:

cheers
 

Magoo

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Just reading the latest AFM, and in it, the mag claims that the Philippines has signed agreement with Alenia Aermacchi for 18 new SF 260s, and the Air Force may also buy 34 second-hand 'Mescaleros' (sorry dont know a thing about 'em), from South Korea.
Mescalero = T-41 = C-172
 

Skyman

New Member
Good news. They can use newly-acquired SF-260E for training and use existing SF-260TP for COIN.

Sound like this is the first step of modernisation program. If I'm not wrong, they will stary looking for fighter in 2012.:cool:
 

Lawman

New Member
I doubt the F-16s would be very welcome - the PAF had more than enough trouble affording their F-5s, let alone the much more complex F-16. For strict air defense purposes, the best bet would actually be to pretty much copy Colombia - i.e. rather than try using expensive fighters, rely on a SAM network, and focus on the real mission, COIN. I would look very seriously at getting something like the Embraer ALX, or hoping for some donated American AT-6s.
 

adroth

New Member
I doubt the F-16s would be very welcome - the PAF had more than enough trouble affording their F-5s, let alone the much more complex F-16. For strict air defense purposes, the best bet would actually be to pretty much copy Colombia - i.e. rather than try using expensive fighters, rely on a SAM network, and focus on the real mission, COIN. I would look very seriously at getting something like the Embraer ALX, or hoping for some donated American AT-6s.
Agreed with most points except for the SAM network.

Given the current threat environment, we have to eye-ball any threat before shooting it down. You can really only do that with aircraft. Furthermore, SAMs are single-use systems -- you can only use it for the air defense role. For the most part, they will be non-performing assets -- a waste of precious resources.

A multi-role aircraft, on the other hand, can be used for both the current COIN battle (especially if secessionists in the south get illusions of being a regular army again and start building fortifications like they did in 2000) as well as air defense.

Using lead-in jet trainers as fighter substitutes makes sense, and is actually what the Philippine Air Force (PAF) is doing at this time. At present, our precious few S211s are tasked for the air defense role. In the recent Talon Vision exercises, actually took part in air combat training with USMC F-18s.

For a lot of us, we'd actually prefer that the government focus on improving our aircraft detection network before moving beyond fighter substitutes. These have the added benefit of benefiting civilian aviation as well as air defense. (The PAF and the civilian Air Transportation Office have a "One Sky" deal with allows one other access to the other's radar data).

After all, what's the point of getting F-16s if you can't vector them to your targets?
 
Last edited:

kato

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
The following article states that they are "E" versions
Ah, ok.

Probably only used as unarmed trainers. The E can have two underwing pylons installed for weapons training - but no other user so far has actually installed them iirc.
 

adroth

New Member
Ah, ok.

Probably only used as unarmed trainers. The E can have two underwing pylons installed for weapons training - but no other user so far has actually installed them iirc.
Other news reports state the these new arrivals will be used exclusively as trainers.

Presumably this will free up the other SF260 versions currently in service, which have already been used for combat duties, to focus on providing close-air support to our ground troops.
 

contedicavour

New Member
Ok I'll try again;) who would be able to harass Chinese or Vietnamese Flankers flying around or close to the Philippines' airspace ? SF260s ;) ?

cheers
 

KGB

New Member
Ok I'll try again;) who would be able to harass Chinese or Vietnamese Flankers flying around or close to the Philippines' airspace ? SF260s ;) ?

It's easy to ignore them if you don't have detection.;)
 

adroth

New Member
Ok I'll try again;) who would be able to harass Chinese or Vietnamese Flankers flying around or close to the Philippines' airspace ? SF260s ;) ?

It's easy to ignore them if you don't have detection.;)
The Philippines has no real indigenous air defense capability. Period. :cool:

The Philippine Air Force is currently one of the most COIN-specialized air arms in Asia. All of the money goes to fighting the current war -- which is against internal enemies.

The SF-260 purchase is aligned with that goal, since it frees up the SF-260s that have already been adopted for COIN use for full-time COIN use.

No pilot in his right mind would dream of going up against a Flanker with a prop-trainer . . . unless the former is on the ground. :D
 

gforce

New Member
Ok I'll try again;) who would be able to harass Chinese or Vietnamese Flankers flying around or close to the Philippines' airspace ? SF260s ;) ?

cheers
Here is the answer to your question, the S211 trainer jets for air defense... :)

Using lead-in jet trainers as fighter substitutes makes sense, and is actually what the Philippine Air Force (PAF) is doing at this time. At present, our precious few S211s are tasked for the air defense role. In the recent Talon Vision exercises, actually took part in air combat training with USMC F-18s.
 
Top