United States Marine Corps

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
The pilot ejected successfully, but the USMC F-35 crashed somewhere in South-Carolina and the jetfighter is now unfindable.
Lots of memes doing the rounds about this. Mostly revolving around a lost poster. Some are even humorous.
 

StobieWan

Super Moderator
Staff member
To be fair, almost anything lost from the air in SC, never gets found. They're still missing a nuclear bomb or two from the sixties I believe.
 

Sandhi Yudha

Well-Known Member
As I mentioned in another, the US army’s V-280 must be more reliable as the build will be in the thousands.
Absolutely.
Also this time nobody survived the crash.





Lots of memes doing the rounds about this. Mostly revolving around a lost poster. Some are even humorous.
To be fair, almost anything lost from the air in SC, never gets found. They're still missing a nuclear bomb or two from the sixties I believe.
The good news is that the F-35B was found 30 hours later. So the chinese or Iranians didn't get the chance to recover it and take it home.
 

OldNavy63

Active Member
The USMC Marine Rotational Force - Darwin (MRF-D), commenced with a force of 200 Marines arriving in April 2012. MRF-D has grown over the years to now comprise 2,500 Marines and supporting elements. The attached USNI report is from a US perspective focussing on MRF-D and also the more recently established Marine Rotational Forces Southeast Asia (MRF-SEA).

 

FormerDirtDart

Well-Known Member
The LST-100 from Damen seems to be a popular choice.

In September Bollinger was awarded a contract to build LSM-1 based on their recent Israeli LSV build, itself an updated variant of the Frank Besson-class LSV operated by the US Army. It too being called LSM Block-1. With completion scheduled for FY 2027.
So it remains to be seen where the program is actually going.
Is Bollinger's ILSV/LSM going to be an interim use vessel to help develop doctrine?
Will Bollinger build more than one LSM?
Will the USN pursue a two class build program, fielding both Bollinger's ILSV and Austal's LST-100?

 

OldTex

Well-Known Member
On the RAN discussion thread (post #14165) it was mentioned that NAVSEA had procured the design package for the LST-100. The details included the following:
Background
The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) is issuing a sole source contract to Damen Naval for the procurement of the Technical Data Package (TDP) and licensing agreement for the LST-100 design. This action supports future Medium Landing Ship (LSM) Block 1 procurements. The contract aims to fulfill the Navy's requirement for multiple non-developmental landing ships, leveraging an existing design to expedite delivery and reduce risks associated with new shipbuilding programs. Damen Naval, based in Vlissingen, The Netherlands, is the sole owner of the LST-100 design.

Work Details
The proposed contract will procure the TDP and establish a licensing agreement for the LST-100 design, which includes:
- Complete 'as-built' configuration data that establishes the design baseline for multiple non-developmental landing ships.
- Licensing agreement allowing use of the LST-100 design across multiple shipyards to expedite delivery.
- Focus on acquiring existing design data rather than developing a new ship design.
This acquisition is funded through Fiscal Year 2025 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy (SCN) appropriations.

Place of Performance
The place of performance includes various shipyards where the landing ships will be constructed.

If the details mentioned are correct then multiple yards (including Austral and Bollinger) could be contracted to build examples of the LST-100 for the USN, just like what is done for other classes of USN warships
 
Top