Remembering at the time all sorts of crazy was going to happen. Including a navalised Eurofighter Typhoon.
In a few decades EMALS maybe a very low risk and cheap option, with considerable power levels. It might make a naval FCAS variation more realistic or possible. Some requirements of scandinavian countries make a carrier type fighter attractive as well.
The UK and the Japanese are looking at Tempest, both countries now with carrier capabilities, and both very much interested in supporting local industry. IMO that is an interesting partnership to explore. Both would have need of something beyond the F-35B. While that would likely still operate off the QE class, Japan could build a larger full sized carrier. I am sure the British would be overtly generous in assistance in that matter.
I don't see carrier power declining in importance in the future. All evidence shows more countries are investing in it than ever before. Carrier tactics may change, their role may evolve, but the still seem to be important naval pieces out to and beyond 2050.
In a few decades EMALS maybe a very low risk and cheap option, with considerable power levels. It might make a naval FCAS variation more realistic or possible. Some requirements of scandinavian countries make a carrier type fighter attractive as well.
The UK and the Japanese are looking at Tempest, both countries now with carrier capabilities, and both very much interested in supporting local industry. IMO that is an interesting partnership to explore. Both would have need of something beyond the F-35B. While that would likely still operate off the QE class, Japan could build a larger full sized carrier. I am sure the British would be overtly generous in assistance in that matter.
I don't see carrier power declining in importance in the future. All evidence shows more countries are investing in it than ever before. Carrier tactics may change, their role may evolve, but the still seem to be important naval pieces out to and beyond 2050.