Not since January 2005. I suspect that Saab felt BAe was using its involvement in Gripen International to favour Typhoon when both were in contention. Officially it was because Saab had gained enough marketing experience, & no longer needed the tie-up.... but nowadays Gripen is sold by the same BAE that pushes Typhoon ...
cheers
The Swiss military has done similar visits to the other three offering companies in the last 2-3 years, including close examinations and such (I think they visited Dassault first). Sweden just wasn't "available" at that time or something like that.It's about Lt Gen Walter Knutti (Cdr SAF) visiting SwAF 7th fighter wing to take a closer look at the SAAB JAS 39 Gripen.
Must admit Swerve, I'm almost certain BAE are still involved in the Grippen International joint venture, our literature and the Grippen website seem to indicate so. Lets not forget also, BAE own a 20% share in Saab AB Group as a whole.Not since January 2005. I suspect that Saab felt BAe was using its involvement in Gripen International to favour Typhoon when both were in contention. Officially it was because Saab had gained enough marketing experience, & no longer needed the tie-up.
How about the operational budget? The F-5 is known for its low operational costs. Typhoons and Super Hornets would probably require the yearly budget to increase substantially or the numbers cut drastically. Even Rafale would be quite more costly to operate.I think in the end price will be an issue...and i'm not quite sure we are willing to pay for the Typhoon or F/A18E/F(my bet would be on Raffale or JAS39Gripen)
True, but keeping up maintenance for a jet that's not being in production for 25 years now will gradually become more and more difficult and expensive. Also, it depends on what performance you're looking for. The F5 has no BVR capability and is slow vs the other planes mentioned. Still good for some advanced training though I must admit.How about the operational budget? The F-5 is known for its low operational costs. Typhoons and Super Hornets would probably require the yearly budget to increase substantially or the numbers cut drastically. Even Rafale would be quite more costly to operate.
I put it poorly, & I thought the pullback was bigger than it was. My mistake.Must admit Swerve, I'm almost certain BAE are still involved in the Grippen International joint venture, our literature and the Grippen website seem to indicate so. Lets not forget also, BAE own a 20% share in Saab AB Group as a whole.
Anyway, I'm straying off topic. Sorry.
fftopicBy the way, minus the 70 Gripens mentioend, how many remain in Swedish service ?
cheers
I quite agree...as Switzerland has no agressor role, flying in and between the mountains with the agilty, the F-5/E could pose quite a threat to other 4 th generation fighters, as allready proven in Switzerland. Check out: airshowaction.com/axalp06The F5 has no BVR capability and is slow vs the other planes mentioned.
I thought the Czech Gripens were new-built for the Czech Republic?fftopic
SwAF ordered 204. Six of those don't exist, crashes and so on. 28 is temporarily in the hands of Hungarian and Czech AF. So SwAF, FMV and FOI should have 170 Gripens in all versions. Ca 70 of those is the latest (hardware-)version, that is C/D. 30 A/B will be upgraded to C/D.
I haven't found anything about what will happen to the 70 "old" Gripen jets.
In a few years SwAF should have 100 of the latest Gripen fighter jets and probably alot of spare parts.
You included both Czech & Hungarian Gripens among the Swedish tally, but they were new-build for the Czechs, not ex-SwAF.I was only describing the swedish Gripens.
The leased Gripens are upgraded A/B-versions.
If I got it right those leased Gripens will be replaced by new ones. The leased Gripens can be bought, if not - the fighters will be returned to SwAF.
http://www.fmv.se/WmTemplates/Page.aspx?id=1413
ETPS has one 39B.
[[[Move posts to new threads? Mods?]]]