Snakecharmer
New Member
Does anyone have any info on the Gotland? I heard they are very capable subs, shame they havent been exported, but thats Sweden for you.
The Collins Class subs we have were a Swedish design, the initial "physical" problems we had with them were due to poor swedish workmanship. The first vessel had its bow section fabricated in sweden. The welding was so poor we had to redo it ourselves. From our perspective, if we ordered any other vessels of any type from Sweden we would build everything in Australia,PAF GIRL said:Swedish are such wierdos! They make advanced tech equipment yet do not export!! :mad
They were almost exported to Pakistan, if you ask any MOD people, but French had deeper pockets, and DCN enjoyed a long relationship with the operators in Karachi.Snakecharmer said:Does anyone have any info on the Gotland? I heard they are very capable subs, shame they havent been exported, but thats Sweden for you.
I beg to differ. Sweden exports its hi technology equipment, but they are strict about their export policy, like Australia. They are not like the French, who will bend over for all passerbys with a fist full of dollars (or Euros).PAF GIRL said:Swedish are such wierdos! They make advanced tech equipment yet do not export!! :mad
There's some interesting relationships between DCN and Karachi. :helpshamsi said:I beg to differ. Sweden exports its hi technology equipment, but they are strict about their export policy, like Australia. They are not like the French, who will bend over for all passerbys with a fist full of dollars (or Euros).PAF GIRL said:Swedish are such wierdos! They make advanced tech equipment yet do not export!! :mad
Whats the use? They don't export them to countries with unresolved conflicts and countries that would need/use their weapons effectively! Whats a weapon when it can't be proven in a combat zone.shamsi said:I beg to differ. Sweden exports its hi technology equipment, but they are strict about their export policy, like Australia. They are not like the French, who will bend over for all passerbys with a fist full of dollars (or Euros).PAF GIRL said:Swedish are such wierdos! They make advanced tech equipment yet do not export!! :mad
This is perhaps one of the most insightful statement ever suggested on this forum!Snakecharmer said:most weapons are bought so that their capabilities ensure that they will never have to be used.
And the Jinnah Naval base in Ormara is to feed ducks perhaps??elkaboingo said:probably not. ive seen the agosta 90b subs operating from karachi, pakistans only port as of now. that is also where all of our frigates and things are based too.
So I take it that SSN and SSBNs do need a separate base to operate from.And the Jinnah Naval base in Ormara is to feed ducks perhaps
In theory yes, The reality is that sub crews in a non war environment will be rotated off every 30 days. It's called a blue/gold team rotation. The USN ran psychology and behavioural tests starting from the late 1960's and worked out an optimum non war endurance and efficiency "slot". Unless they were on a war footing, the blue/gold rotation slot would not vary.joker said:So I take it that SSN and SSBNs do need a separate base to operate from.And the Jinnah Naval base in Ormara is to feed ducks perhaps
Whilst on the issue of SSNs am I to understad that with the nuclear powered propulsion system they can remain submerged indefinately? i.e. travel across the globe submerged throughout the journey do factors such as air, food stocks or clean water place a limit on their range? If so whats the average range of a SSN (in kms pls.)?