Earth Observation Satellites are ***not*** considered aggressive.
Earth Observation Satellites are ***not*** considered the same way as overflights.
Earth Observation is ***not*** considered a provocation.
Earth Observation is considered LEGAL SURVEILLANCE.
If anyone is thinking otherwise, then they are setting new standards. Does anyone think eg taking a picture of a Chinese warship is an automatic provocation.
There are a huge number of EO sats out there in circumpolar orbits. They need to pass over other countries. There is no alternative.
Where do you think Google Earth gets its imagery from...?
Well if the report is thru then the Chinese have changed the rules of the game.
Anyway why does the US have to see whats going on in other countries?
Whatever way you chop it, its to gather military intel.
Checking out the position of a warship, no not a provovation, its probley been shadowed anyway.
But using satalites to take highly detailed pictures of military instalations, thats a different story, ...hmm to be honest I can't see the problem with someone dazzling a Military satalite.
Its not like there knocking out Satalites that are mapping the sea floor!