Russia helps China build new aircraft carrier

tatra

New Member
Verified Defense Pro
There are a series of articles that have been OSINT published including JANEs and Fisher.

In addition one of the more respectable Sino posters has started adding commentary, and in fact after conferring with him he was gracious enough to send me a scrape of material. Some follows.

Jane's Fighting Ships
Yuzhao (Type 071) class
(ASSAULT SHIP) (LHD)
IN SERVICE: 0
BUILDING: 1
Name No Builders Laid down Launched Commissioned
-KUNLUNSHAN 998 Hudong-Zhonghua Shipyard, Shanghai June 2006 21 Dec 2006 2008

Displacement, tons: 17,600 approx
Dimensions, feet (metres): 689.0 × 91.9 × 23.0 (210.0 × 28.0 × 7.0)
Main machinery: CODAD; 4 SEMT Pielstick 16 PC2.6 V 400 diesels; 47,000 hp (35.2 MW); 2 shafts
Speed, knots: 20
Complement: 120
Military lift: Four air-cushion vehicles plus vehicles and troops
Guns: 1-76 mm [Ref 1].
4-30 mm/65 AK 630 [Ref 2].
Countermeasures: Decoys: 2 launchers [Ref 3].
Radars: Air search: Type 363 (Sea Tiger) [Ref 4]; E/F-band.
Air/surface search: Type 364 Seagull C [Ref 5]; G-band.
Fire control: Type 347G(2) (LR 66) [Ref 6]; J-band for 76 mm.
Type 347G(1) (Rice Bowl) [Ref 7]; J-band for AK 630.
Navigation: Type NR 2000 [Ref 8]; I-band.
Helicopters: 2 Z-8 Super Frelon.

Programmes: After several years' speculation, the existence of the programme was confirmed when construction of a ship was initiated in mid-2006. The programme constitutes a key component of the PLA(N)'s plan to improve its sealift and power projection capabilities. Further ships are expected once evaluation trials have been completed.
Structure: The principal features of the ship include a large well deck area to accommodate four Air Cushion Vehicles (ACV) in the aft two-thirds of the ship. The ACVs are likely to access the ship through a stern gate. The ship may have to ballast down for operation. There is a large stern helicopter flight deck and a hangar. An internal garage deck for vehicles may be accessed via side ramps (port and starboard). There is space for the HQ7 launcher which may be fitted at a later date. Two LCVPs are carried.
Opinion: This ship represents a major enhancement of amphibious capability.
Is there any imagery out there showing a landing craft of any kind (small or large, air cushion or conventional) actually entering/leaving the docking well?
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Is there any imagery out there showing a landing craft of any kind (small or large, air cushion or conventional) actually entering/leaving the docking well?
None in the public domain that I'm aware of. I'm guessing that they've done satellite based trig on the stern and come up with the well measurements.

but honestly, NFI
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
Is there any imagery out there showing a landing craft of any kind (small or large, air cushion or conventional) actually entering/leaving the docking well?
nothing, but we know that they have something like LCAC available.

Remind me again - how did their last Great Leap turn out? And anyway, experience cannot go through 'leaps'. For a technology trailer like China it can sort of 'leap' technology by buying or stealing frontline technology from others, but experience is always gained, bit by bit.
I don't see why you need to turn this political.

Hence why I think the 3 LHA hulls underway are precursors to a carrier
interesting, I haven't seen any signs of such hulls.
 

justone

Banned Member
need russia

yeah, this is just another article by Andrei Pinkov trying to link China to Russia somehow. I think at the moment, putting China's program together with Russia is a little too far of a stretch. It doesn't even seem like China is asking Russia for any help.
China needs russian assistance that a fact with no experience in navy action on a global level and with no help from western navies it only hope is to make a agreement with russia on building a aircraft carrier
 

KiwiRob

Well-Known Member
China needs russian assistance that a fact with no experience in navy action on a global level and with no help from western navies it only hope is to make a agreement with russia on building a aircraft carrier
I take it that you haven't been anywhere near a Russian shipyard lately. The Chinese are much better shipbuilders than the Russians, besides all the Russian carriers were built in the Ukraine and that's where the experience lies, well it would if they were still capable of building ships in the Ukraine which at the moment they aren't, apart from one yard in Kherson, all the other yards are pretty much idle. I also don't think current Russian experience counts for much, they only have one carrier which is a dock queen most of the time, I think the Russians and Chinese are both starting from scratch.
 

justone

Banned Member
Why do you think that developing the capability indigenously is impossible?
the reason i said this it will take more time to make a carrier from no experience or knowledge of aircraft carrier back in early day of developing aircraft carrier there was the up and down in development it take lot into making aircraft carrier than you kind imagine that why there is not to many navies with aircraft carriers it will take alot resources and skill to do this in china its not a easy project to do on your own if china had alot assistance from a western country in the know how field it could be done .But it got a old russia aircraft carrier that its studying the chinese are good in copying from russia
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
So in other words it would take them more time. That's fine. But it's not impossible for them to do it alone.

In any event, Russia does have some things to offer in that area, but not very many. I don't know that Russia can produce an aircraft carrier right now.
 

justone

Banned Member
I take it that you haven't been anywhere near a Russian shipyard lately. The Chinese are much better shipbuilders than the Russians, besides all the Russian carriers were built in the Ukraine and that's where the experience lies, well it would if they were still capable of building ships in the Ukraine which at the moment they aren't, apart from one yard in Kherson, all the other yards are pretty much idle. I also don't think current Russian experience counts for much, they only have one carrier which is a dock queen most of the time, I think the Russians and Chinese are both starting from scratch.
They are going to start from scratch since they don't have shipyard in Urkaine. It's a different when you have a aircraft carrier in your navy than not having one. That why both need each other in some way . I forgot about the old carriers was built in Ukraine . The Chinese navy is building it own ship at rapid pace considering they are making over 20 ships right now.
 

tphuang

Super Moderator
They are going to start from scratch since they don't have shipyard in Urkaine. It's a different when you have a aircraft carrier in your navy than not having one. That why both need each other in some way . I forgot about the old carriers was built in Ukraine . The Chinese navy is building it own ship at rapid pace considering they are making over 20 ships right now.
They got a lot of help from the Ukrainians for the aircraft project, they've been studying Varyag for years. They are definitely not starting from scratch, but the first carrier they build is obviously going to have a lot of mistakes.
 

swerve

Super Moderator
the reason i said this it will take more time to make a carrier from no experience or knowledge of aircraft carrier back in early day of developing aircraft carrier there was the up and down in development it take lot into making aircraft carrier than you kind imagine that why there is not to many navies with aircraft carriers it will take alot resources and skill to do this in china its not a easy project to do on your own if china had alot assistance from a western country in the know how field it could be done .But it got a old russia aircraft carrier that its studying the chinese are good in copying from russia
China has had many years of studying old aircraft carriers. It bought an old British-built carrier from Australia for scrapping - and kept it for years to study. It's now had its hands on how many ex-Soviet carriers?

China now has a great deal of knowledge of aircraft carriers. As well as physical ships, I have no doubt Chinese designers have been studying everything they can get their hands on from published sources, photographs, etc. China has no specific carrier-building experience yet, but a great deal of knowledge. They're not starting from scratch now: they've been busy doing the groundwork for years. China has a huge shipbuilding industry, & is well ahead of, for instance, India in that regard. Everything is in place to build carriers.
 

exported_kiwi

New Member
Dragonfire, things like practice fields can't be easily hidden, go look on Google Earth at sites in the US and Russia and you'll see what I mean. If China built a replica of the Melbourne's flight deck we'd know about it.

I recall seeing pictures of a mock up flight deck like this outside Beijing a few years ago. Can't recall where I saw the pic though but it was definitely a deck and was apparently used for practice, but, this is all from memory which is rather hazy these days. I can say for sure that it was in China, somewhere around Beijing though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

shag

New Member
I am not sure if this has been noted but the Indian version of kiev class(gorshkov) has had the front AA batteries removed as per specs of indian navy. The additional space is used to substantially(130-140% from pictures) lengthen the runway for the Migs to take off.
It should be noted that this fact combined with ski jump and arrestor wires would allow Indian ACs operating from this Aircraft carrier to take off with significantly heavier combat loads then that allowed in the default configuration of this carrier.
Just a lil FYI from my end. :)
PS: this is my first post here and I am already loving it . . .
 

Feanor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Hi shag. Welcome to defencetalk. Please do introduce yourself to us in the intros and off-topic forum. Read the rules and enjoy your stay.

On-topic, you're right. The Vikramaditiya is very different from the Kiev-class from which it's derived.
 

shag

New Member
Thanks for the welcome feanor. :)

I read this topic since the beginning and I saw many people argue that varyag and the other kievs acquired in stripped down condition by china will help it get experience in operating an aircraft carrier. There was also talk of converitng varyag to a carrier with boilers et al.

My point here is that in it default configuration the kiev class is classified as a aviation cruiser and not even a proper aircraft carrier. Only aircraft capable operating from this class in its default configuration were the VTOL Yak-38 and the choppers(more commonly).There is no way su33 could operate from kiev even with zero weapons load. In fact the indian carrier length during mods has been increased to 283m from default 273m with runway length increase by ~140%.
All the equipment for launch and recovery of a/c were stripped from chinese hulks which can anyway not launch any big birds. Given these facts what help do you think these hulks will provide to chinese in their aircraft carrier program??

Somehow I doubt the recent news from chinese sources about converting varyag to a operational status. Given the time it would take to find and install the thousands of types of equipment back on it, extending the ramp etc sufficiently to allow decent carrier ops. I am not sure of the viability of the project. either as a refurbished carrier or as a trainer of any sort for future carrier operations if the chinese were hoping for it.
 

shag

New Member
ohh I just read my previous post and before anybody clobbers me asking how a ships length can be increased JLT, the increased ten meters is from the ski-jump which extends out from the bow.
 
Top