Well Orban will always be wild card on Nato. However this shown complex situation in Euro zone on what to do with Russia. Especially if things get protrected.
Thomas Friedman in New York Times put article that basically ask Xi Jinping to push Putin. However China also already stated any settlement on this conflict will also have to adress Russia security issue.
Personally I do see it is unreasonable for West to expect China pushing Russia on Settlement if West also not pushing Ukraine for setlement on Russian security concern. Compromise means both side taking step backs. Yes Russia will be hardest hit by this economic wars with West, but so does West.
What security issues? First you say Oban is a "wild card on NATO". There are also other "wild cards." Turkey. Or Germany.
Then you talk about "Russia security issue". These two are connected. You do know that NATO is an organization based on consensus? That NATO cannot attack Russia unless Orban, Erdogan, and Scholz say so? In addition to the governments of the Baltics, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, etc. etc. Especially given the Russian nuclear weapons, NATO is never ever going to launch any kind of aggressive action against Russia.
Or do you believe that Ukraine is a threat to Russia? Do you believe the lie from Russia that Ukraine are secretly building nuclear weapons (which, by the way is inconsistent with Ukraine becoming NATO member -- oops, Putin did not consider that did he).
The only country in Europe that is increasing the threat level in Europe, is Russia. European NATO countries had been reducing their defense spending until 2008 (Georgia) and 2014 (Ukraine). Now they increase defense spending again, and again it is due to Russian aggression, not the other way around.
The US does not want any conflict with Russia, they want to focus on China. It's Russia and Putin that is forcing the hands of the US and Europe.
Given what we know, NATO should not consider "Russian concerns". Why? NATO countries should consider the Russian armed forces and in particular the Russian nuclear weapons. Apart from that, Russia (or Putin at least) has declared war, he has also declared his aim: to rebuild the Russian empire. I see no reason why Europe should accept that just for some flimsy excuse of "security concern" from Russia.