Canterbury is not due out of maintenace for another2 weeks, and last Saturday I saw her with th large Sat dome removed & scaffolding up. Not sure what's being done on her but accordign to this link she's being made ready in case neded.It's a bit ironic that Canterbury uplifted the 4 Hueys from Samoa late Aug (they would have been helpful now, if they happened to still be there, to locate people washed out to sea, drop off supplies and for medical evacuations etc). According to the PR link the Canterbury is back in NZ.
RNZN - HMNZS CANTERBURY DELIVERS VEHICLES AND STORES TO DILI, TIMOR LESTE
Like the Indonesian tsunami where helos played an important role, surely it would make sense to send some Hueys back now and load up the Canty with Army and civilian engineering equipment for the post-disaster reconstruction and to remove the debris in the interim, plus to use the on board hospital etc. Would make a good command/coordination centre etc. Let's see what the Govt does I suppose.
Hey mattyem whats the talk about the new ship & how they handle not much info in the Navy website on how they are performing I know they would of been in some pretty ruff wheather in the past couple of monthsjust to note, im currently serving on the big easy (A11, endeavour) the rumor in the mill atm is leavinfg the fwd setup as is, cutting off the back half (engine spaces and such like) with an up graded approach. this will still meet requirements and carry us for another 8/10 years, and we all know the RNZN likes the cheap approach
When you look at what the Spanish are doing with their BAMs, I am sure something similar can be done with the NZ OPV. May require losing the helicopter hangar and deck for weight, but surely there will be room aft to design a diving tender, or a minehunter version, much less a hydropgraphic version. May even design a patrol ship version similar to the Irish Rosins without a helicopter deck and hangar as well. In the past New Zealand with their previous patrol ships they were able to design one as a diving tender.The next vessels to be replaced are:
HMNZS Endeavour (to be retired c.2013)
HMNZS Manawanui (commissioned 1988)
HMNZS Resolution (commisioned the first time 1989)
It seems without a game changing policy departure of the Australian defence review type, there won't be any significant change in vessel numbers in the RNZN. Discussion would therefore most fruitfully dwell on vessels requiring replacement. If there can't be an increase in numbers, maybe an increase in capability is more possible.
It would be nice to see Endeavour replaced by a mini JSS style ship able to carry out some of the replenishment and humanitarian functions of Canterbury (not the patrol duties). I wonder if the current government might see fit to make the replacement for Resolution more in the OPV mould, an evolved Protector or a test-bed OCV.
Does anyone have any ideas for the replacement dive tender and any possible design synergies with current Project Protector hulls?
No idea about designs but this editorial from May2009 'Navy Today' magazine shows much of Navy's thinking on future fleet...The next vessels to be replaced are:
HMNZS Endeavour (to be retired c.2013)
HMNZS Manawanui (commissioned 1988)
HMNZS Resolution (commisioned the first time 1989)
It seems without a game changing policy departure of the Australian defence review type, there won't be any significant change in vessel numbers in the RNZN. Discussion would therefore most fruitfully dwell on vessels requiring replacement. If there can't be an increase in numbers, maybe an increase in capability is more possible.
It would be nice to see Endeavour replaced by a mini JSS style ship able to carry out some of the replenishment and humanitarian functions of Canterbury (not the patrol duties). I wonder if the current government might see fit to make the replacement for Resolution more in the OPV mould, an evolved Protector or a test-bed OCV.
Does anyone have any ideas for the replacement dive tender and any possible design synergies with current Project Protector hulls?
For mine hunters I suppose they could order a couple of Huon class Mine Hunters from Australia. They are already in service, so it would be a completely off the shelf purchase. An option off the OPV's already delivered (they are modified Rosin class?) would be to remove the ice strengthening from the design and build a few more?When you look at what the Spanish are doing with their BAMs, I am sure something similar can be done with the NZ OPV. May require losing the helicopter hangar and deck for weight, but surely there will be room aft to design a diving tender, or a minehunter version, much less a hydropgraphic version. May even design a patrol ship version similar to the Irish Rosins without a helicopter deck and hangar as well. In the past New Zealand with their previous patrol ships they were able to design one as a diving tender.
I thought they put a couple in reserve then decided they needed them as OPV's and pulled them back out? Oh, and they are almost brand new still, they wont be retired anytime soon, even if OPC/OPV's are built.Why not just buy the Huons. Atleast lease one and find out if its what you want.
One has been in reserve (may just have come out), new, good, not heavily used and soonish to be replaced by the OCV. Im sure the AuGov would like to find a local buyer for these.
I dunno, I did hear they were being used as OPV. If I was the Ausgov I would be relocating them up north to help with patrol boats. They are quiet good boats with loads of life (not infinate they are fiberglass).I thought they put a couple in reserve then decided they needed them as OPV's and pulled them back out? Oh, and they are almost brand new still, they wont be retired anytime soon, even if OPC/OPV's are built.
LOLI dunno, I did hear they were being used as OPV. If I was the Ausgov I would be relocating them up north to help with patrol boats. They are quiet good boats with loads of life (not infinate they are fiberglass).
I don't know if the OCV will replace the Huon or the Patrol boats. They both have so much life left in them and are both very good boats. Maybe they will gift some to pacific island nations..
NZ is in the pacific isn't it? :
IIRC the MHI (Minehunter, Inshore) had the MCM kit removed and was then sold for use as private yachts. Unfortunately, the name of the MHI's escapes me at present, though Shoalwater and Rushcutter come to mind.LOL
What ended up happening to those two catamaran things that the Huon's replaced?
You are correct with those names. They were to be a class of 6 but when the first two turned out to be lemons the last four where cancelledIIRC the MHI (Minehunter, Inshore) had the MCM kit removed and was then sold for use as private yachts. Unfortunately, the name of the MHI's escapes me at present, though Shoalwater and Rushcutter come to mind.
-Cheers
Is Resolution really the MCM asset?:crazy
Ah, the wonders of modern MCM equipment!Is Resolution really the MCM asset?:crazy
And much of the mine countermeasures gear can be containerized and stored on an aft workdeck of OPVs thereby making OPVs useful replacements for dedicated mine countermeasures vessels. Currently New Zealand is using a small diving tender and a hydrographic ship's aft workdecks. Its this flexibility that is the root for the US Navy's LCS.Ah, the wonders of modern MCM equipment!
Remotely operated equipment like RNZN's REMUS AUV & Sea-Eye Falcon ROV mean you can turn up & perform credible MCM activity without needing a dedicated MCMV. This way youcan deploy MCM equipment from any vessel in the fleet & operate at a safe distance from the threat!
Such equipment allows smaller Navies like RNZN to afford MCM capability - something RNZN is still re-generating.
So no - as stated Resolution is a survey vessel & Manawanui is a (very capable) dive-support vessel - both quite relevant assets for this exercise!