The navy's plans for the Arafura class seem even more modest than I first thought. I always knew that it had a modest weapons fit but now it seems that its admittedly limited aviation capability has also been stripped back.
According to this article the navy has removed the necessary deck strengthening from the design, meaning that it cannot even land Seahawk or MRH 90 sized helicopters.
www.theaustralian.com.au
All the evidence I have read so far suggests that the Arafura is what it is ... a cheap OPV.
This ship could yet represent an opportunity missed to build the more capable OCV foreshadowed a decade ago.
The Arafura Class is an emotive topic.
What is it / What should it be / What could it be.
My personnel view is it was a wasted opportunity.
A great choice to replace the Fremantle Class Class and be what the Armadale's and the generations before them could never be.
A true off shore patrol vessel.
The Arafura Class would of been appropriate in 2005; but as history shows we went for yet another small patrol boat.
Come the 2016 DWP, we get clarity that the over worked Armadale's are now finally to be replaced with a true OPV.
"Hooray"
The RAN and the Commonwealth finally get what we should of had ages ago.
But there's a catch.
We now go to select an OPV with the "cultural mindset" of having operated three generations of patrol boats and view this new vessel as an extension of their previous roles, but now with the benefit of longer range and sea keeping.
It was not a smart call in 2016 and one made worse in a world that has changed so dramatically in the last few years.
We should of selected a vessel that could do all the constabulary stuff and much, much more.
The big variable is China.
The staggering rate of growth of its Navy and the accompanying robust behaviour of its antagonistic leadership is frightening.
They are building a RAN every year and more.................Mind boggling construction.
Add to the mix our main ally in the USA is domestically challenged, does not help our situation.
It's a very different world to a short time ago.
The reality is, that the Arafura Class are completely out of date before the first vessel hits the water.
A good Skills / job creation exercise that I don't disagree with, but that's it.
So what is the Arafura Class.............I'd suggest a good budget vessel for off shore duties in a benign environment that would be appropriate for another era.
What should it be........................A more robust up gunned vessel with integrated helicopter hanger and flight deck ...........Not the Arafura Class!
What could it be....................... Working with the decision we acquired the Arafura Class, it should be better armed within the limitations of the Arafura's space and weight.
Alternatively seek a way to enlarge the existing design with a block extension to provide space for additional weapons / systems.
These ships are in the infancy of their build cycle so there is much opportunity to evolve their capability ASAP.
As to the flight deck, there are two problems.
One - we cannot at this stage land a medium helicopter on the flight deck !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Two - we have a Navy leadership making absolutely appalling decisions, if this was in fact their call.
The flight can be fixed, but can we fix the culture that allowed this to happen in the first place.
A lot of maritime challenges ahead within our region for the 2020's
We need a fleet properly equipped to meet these challenges.
Regards S