Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates

Mr Ignorant

New Member
well, interim the timescale i believe is from 08/09 to 2013 by the time the JSF reaches full operational service.

Its an advance piece of kit yes but I'm going to relate it to a keyboard analogy. You have your current keyboard its a standard windows keyboard (the basic FA/18) and you replace it with a mid range logitech (super hornet) it has these neat little buttons that link you to different things instantly and its a big advancement on its predecessor. Then you get the G15 gaming keyboard (JSF) It looks great for one, it has its own screen so you don't even have to look at the screen some if not most of the time (Helmet Mounted Display) It comes with a whole new extra keypad on one side allowing you to use it like a joystick (EOTS) and its made of some cool new materials so it stays clean longer (better maintainable), It is low profile instead of sticking out like a smelly porta-potty it blends in better with the desk (LO) and adds to the look of the computer (multi role make it a force multiplier).
:) I see. Couldn't tell it better myself. Actually makes sense. :eek:nfloorl:
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
A question about the Superhornets meant as a "Interim" Fighter.

First, define "Interim" within the RAAF context? What are the timescales for the "Interim period" in view of the fact that a review is now underway with regards to Fighter procurement in the RAAF?

And if the Superhornet is such an advanced piece of kit, why has it been categorised as an "Interim" aircraft?

Feedback please.
The Super Hornets will be in RAAF service, assuming the new Government doesn't cancel the contract, in 2010 with initial operational capability in 2011.

13 years of support for the entire squadron has been funded up front hence the seemingly huge price tag of the Super Hornets being $6.6b. The squadron should therefore be in-service until 2023/24.

It is an interim aircraft because RAAF will be buying the F-35 to replace it's legacy F/A-18A/B fleet and the F-111 fleet (eventually) however the F-35 won't start delivery prior to 2013/14. Ther Super Hornet will "bridge the gap" in capability lost when the F-111 retires in 2010 until the F-35 can replace the capability around 2017/18.

The Government will by then have made a decision to acquire another batch of F-35's to replace the Super Hornets from 2023/24 or a separate fighter/strike type such as an unmanned combat aircraft, if any are feasible at that point.
 

flyboyEB

New Member
G'Day All

This is my first post ever on a forum so please be gentle, I'm not sure if I even clicked the right button to post, but here I go:confused:
Has anyone heard of a new unit the RAAF is supposedly to set up as Foward Air Control and that will provide Joint Terminal Attack Controllers? What I read (I can't even remeber where...wikipedia or somewhere else unreliable) is that it will draw recruits from the Airfield Defence Guards and will operate like the USAF Special Tactics Teams.
Is there any truth in this at all or is it some journalist using their artistic licence after hearing about the formation of No.4 Squadron? I've become suspicious of the media after all the stupidly inaccurate things they say (PC-9 fighter jets? Soldiers from the 57th Infantry Battalion? Don't you mean 5/7RAR?:eek:nfloorl: ) But anyway, can someone 'in the know' answer my question?
Thanks
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
This is my first post ever on a forum so please be gentle, I'm not sure if I even clicked the right button to post, but here I go:confused:
Has anyone heard of a new unit the RAAF is supposedly to set up as Foward Air Control and that will provide Joint Terminal Attack Controllers? What I read (I can't even remeber where...wikipedia or somewhere else unreliable) is that it will draw recruits from the Airfield Defence Guards and will operate like the USAF Special Tactics Teams.
Is there any truth in this at all or is it some journalist using their artistic licence after hearing about the formation of No.4 Squadron? I've become suspicious of the media after all the stupidly inaccurate things they say (PC-9 fighter jets? Soldiers from the 57th Infantry Battalion? Don't you mean 5/7RAR?:eek:nfloorl: ) But anyway, can someone 'in the know' answer my question?
Thanks
You've heard correctly. RAAF is establishing a Special Tactics Squadron which will be raised as 4 Squadron in January 2009. It will include the current Forward Air Control and Development Unit (FACDU), plus newly trained JTAC's.

They will be JTAC controllers primarily but will have to undergoe elements of Special Operations training to integrate into SOCOMD sub-units.

I expect they will need to undertake SFET (special forces entry test) and pass the Commando course, special forces weapons course and parachute operators course and special forces Sigs and first air courses as a minimum, in addition to their RAAF JTAC qualifications.

Advertisments for volunteers have appeared in Air Force News and apparently the positions are open to ALL musterings and specialisations within RAAF, provided they meet special forces requirements.

Information can be found here:

http://digital.realviewtechnologies.com/flip.asp?xml=defencenews_airforce.xml&i=November 29th 2007
 

barra

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Has anyone heard of a new unit the RAAF is supposedly to set up as Foward Air Control and that will provide Joint Terminal Attack Controllers? What I read (I can't even remeber where...wikipedia or somewhere else unreliable) is that it will draw recruits from the Airfield Defence Guards and will operate like the USAF Special Tactics Teams.
The original plan was to use ADG's to fill the JTAC role. Trials of ADG's were not apparently that successfull (stop laughing AD :p: ). As AD says the positions have been advertised across the ADF. I have heard that Army artillery types were more successfull, if they apply to join the JTAC teams they would most likely transfer to the RAAF.
 

AGRA

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
I think people here are just very impatient about what we are getting from the JSF program. Turkey seems to be building whole entire aircraft for other countries and will have complete access to codes etc.
Hah, what crap. Turkey will have the alternate centre barrel production centre to Northrop Grumman. Basically they will just be milling 400 big pieces of alumina.
 

flyboyEB

New Member
The original plan was to use ADG's to fill the JTAC role. Trials of ADG's were not apparently that successfull (stop laughing AD :p: ). As AD says the positions have been advertised across the ADF. I have heard that Army artillery types were more successfull, if they apply to join the JTAC teams they would most likely transfer to the RAAF.
Thanks for that Aussie Digger+ barra. I read that the SASR had USAF Special Tactics Teams attached to them in Afghanistan and Iraq, I guess in future the RAAF will take over that role
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Hah, what crap. Turkey will have the alternate centre barrel production centre to Northrop Grumman. Basically they will just be milling 400 big pieces of alumina.
Considering the type of JSF work thats already happening here I'd wonder why anyone would get excited about wanting centre barrel work. The billet machining currently being done in Melb for complex components is far more technologically useful....
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
The original plan was to use ADG's to fill the JTAC role. Trials of ADG's were not apparently that successfull (stop laughing AD :p: ). As AD says the positions have been advertised across the ADF. I have heard that Army artillery types were more successfull, if they apply to join the JTAC teams they would most likely transfer to the RAAF.
I don't have anything against Adgies. I just laugh at the claims of some younger ones who for some reason see themselves as "equals" to SOCOMD operators... :D
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I don't have anything against Adgies. I just laugh at the claims of some younger ones who for some reason see themselves as "equals" to SOCOMD operators... :D
No disrespect to current adgies, but I recall just prior to ET in 99 that outsourced Garrison Support resulted in a few of the "firies" getting restasked as adgies.

I interviewed some of those early ex "firies" - and they were not the sharpest knives in the drawer.....
 

lobbie111

New Member
ADG's would have to be the laziest infantry in the defence force IMHO. I went to the base at Amberley to find them all (3 quarters of the unit) at the bar in the morning. They are very gun-hoe in my opinion very keen to show off their guns
 

sunderer

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Whats your qualification to judge ADGies Lobbie? Are you able to compare or just making assumptions?
 

Mr Ignorant

New Member
The Super Hornets will be in RAAF service, assuming the new Government doesn't cancel the contract, in 2010 with initial operational capability in 2011.

13 years of support for the entire squadron has been funded up front hence the seemingly huge price tag of the Super Hornets being $6.6b. The squadron should therefore be in-service until 2023/24.

It is an interim aircraft because RAAF will be buying the F-35 to replace it's legacy F/A-18A/B fleet and the F-111 fleet (eventually) however the F-35 won't start delivery prior to 2013/14. Ther Super Hornet will "bridge the gap" in capability lost when the F-111 retires in 2010 until the F-35 can replace the capability around 2017/18.

The Government will by then have made a decision to acquire another batch of F-35's to replace the Super Hornets from 2023/24 or a separate fighter/strike type such as an unmanned combat aircraft, if any are feasible at that point.
Thanks Aussie Digger.

It makes sense for the RAAF in that respect. The F-111s cannot be employed forever, as I too was wondering why the big pricetag. 13 years of support is adequate and something I belief the RMAF should take into account if ever it contemplates buying a squadron of Super Hornets.

The only other issue is the F-35s but any questions I have had about this type has been answered on this thread already. It's been a lot of reading.
 
A

Aussie Digger

Guest
Thanks Aussie Digger.

It makes sense for the RAAF in that respect. The F-111s cannot be employed forever, as I too was wondering why the big pricetag. 13 years of support is adequate and something I belief the RMAF should take into account if ever it contemplates buying a squadron of Super Hornets.

The only other issue is the F-35s but any questions I have had about this type has been answered on this thread already. It's been a lot of reading.
It caused a bit of controversy in Australia too, until Government explained it properly. The normal method was to announce the support costs separately or not at all... Be interesting to see the "real" costs of other strike fighter purchases around the world if they included ALL the cost of operating the capability for a similar period of time at the initial announcement of the capability acquisition...

I suspect some apparent "bargains" may not look so good... :)

Fact is RAAF is buying Super Hornets at the same price as the USN pays for theirs, other platforms such as an evolved F-15 variant or similar would have cost around $30m more per platform for little overall capability improvement, if any...
 

lobbie111

New Member
Whats your qualification to judge ADGies Lobbie? Are you able to compare or just making assumptions?
I am able to compare them because I have been around many Army and Air bases and the Army guards are much more alert, there was a cadet unit that actually managed to get lost out on the surrounding area and the ADG's did not realize they were gone nor did they find them on a perimeter patrol even though they were running communications with them and were on high alert because they got a few new bombs of some kind (don't know which ones) I believe they broke into a building which housed external fuel tanks/pods (not the cadets, some anti war protesters I believe).

I have had enough of these endless talks about the super hornet can someone update me on the caribou and how it's fairing?
 
Last edited:

sunderer

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Now here is where I have a problem because it has been many a year since service personel guarded our facilities, so either these events you describe took place a fair while ago or you heard it from a mate who heard it from an old girlfriends brother sort of tale.Now I am not saying that ADGies are SF but being called lazy to describe an entire mustering is a big call.
 

gf0012-aust

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
I am able to compare them because I have been around many Army and Air bases and the Army guards are much more alert, there was a cadet unit that actually managed to get lost out on the surrounding area and the ADG's did not realize they were gone nor did they find them on a perimeter patrol even though they were running communications with them and were on high alert because they got a few new bombs of some kind (don't know which ones) I believe they broke into a building which housed external fuel tanks/pods (not the cadets, some anti war protesters I believe).
when was this?

1998-2001 was a time when Garrison Support contracts were basically stipulating that the redundant applicants for the outsourced jobs had to try and be accomodated into available jobs. as a result, RAAF ended up with a few firies, green car drivers etc... who slipped into the adgie role

2002 on and the game changed. far more robust decisions were made and there was a lift in quality across a few points.

Post 1999 Garrison Support meant that perimeter and gate work was often done by the site vendor - so I'd be surprised if any adgies were involved.

Some of the events bleated about in the media actually had nothing to do with the uniforms.
 

lobbie111

New Member
yeah I see the CHUBB guys at the gate all the time, there cars are in the carpark next to the gate, i was talking about the large area around the rear and sides of the base where they train in regards to the cadets being lost, they were having cadet exercises and being supervised by adgies and they lost all contact with them.

I do not have a problem with thew ADGies themselves they are great people and all except they are not as active in their role as some of the army bases ive been to they tend to hang around the WETS all day.
 

flyboyEB

New Member
Just throwing this out there

With all the talk of the ADFs supposed recruitment crisis (I'm not in the ADF so I don't know how bad the situation is) is the RAAF having problems getting pilots?
Because if they are, maybe a good idea would be a New Zealand squadron in the RAAF like the RAAF/RAF and RNZAF/RAF squadrons in the WW2 (there were quite a few in Bomber Command if I'm right) There must be a few Kiwis interested in flying high-end aircraft that aren't in the RNZAF (no offence to the RNZAF but there isn't a lot to compare to F-111s and F/A-18s) and the RAAF could get some more numbers through the door. Its probably a stupid idea because the cost of setting up a new squadron might outweigh the advantadges of getting a few pilots, but thats my 2 cents (maybe the haka can add a bit of flavour to the RAAF:wave :dance :mock )
 
Top