Performance of the Merkava in Lebenon

DoC_FouALieR

New Member
My guess is that the VBCI as well as the wheeled Vextra will augment a tracked IFV. I'm not going to pretend I know anything about French politics but perhaps the French could get involved with the German Puma project. As the French consider and are considered to have a first rate military it is likely that they will pursue a tracked IFV considering all other major military powers possess that. Also, a lot of European powers are in the process of or have completed the procurment of new modern tracked IFVs (Spain, Austria, Italy, Greece, Sweden, Finland, Norway, Switzerland, Denmark, The Netherlands)
As I have already said in another topic, we have very clever (!) politics in France that want to cut down the budget of the army by doing wrong calculus like replacing all of our old tracked IFV by a wheeled one, claiming that it is cheaper to operate. The only tracked vehicles that are going to remain in our land army is the Leclerc MBT, the breaching/general purpose vehicle of the engineering, and some swedish Bv-26 for mountains troops.
France refused the offer by the German to be involved in the Puma IFV project.
The Vextra is only a demonstrator of 8x8 mobility and firepower made by GIAT, it will never enter full production.
However, the VBCI is still superior to the Stryker by having the formidable 8x8 gear of the Vextra, superior protection and weaponry (could even be armed with the famous CTAI 40mm gun). But it is wheeled.
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
The Striker is also not a real IFV.
Not armoured enough. Not able to follow high mobile, tracked tank forces.
No bigger weapons than heavy MGs or grenade machine weapons.
There would be a massacre if they would face some real IFVs.
So Stryker is not a real opinion for the IDF as a combined arms IFV.
It is a vehicle for other tasks.
 

Izzy1

Banned Member
wait how did they even get european made anti-armor missiles anyway.
As well as a quantity to the Lebanon, Euromissile GmbH also sold at least 200 MILAN rounds and 20 launchers to Syria back in the late 1980s.
 

contedicavour

New Member
DoC_FouALieR said:
As I have already said in another topic, we have very clever (!) politics in France that want to cut down the budget of the army by doing wrong calculus like replacing all of our old tracked IFV by a wheeled one, claiming that it is cheaper to operate. The only tracked vehicles that are going to remain in our land army is the Leclerc MBT, the breaching/general purpose vehicle of the engineering, and some swedish Bv-26 for mountains troops.
France refused the offer by the German to be involved in the Puma IFV project.
The Vextra is only a demonstrator of 8x8 mobility and firepower made by GIAT, it will never enter full production.
However, the VBCI is still superior to the Stryker by having the formidable 8x8 gear of the Vextra, superior protection and weaponry (could even be armed with the famous CTAI 40mm gun). But it is wheeled.
Do you know what equipment the French Army will deploy in Lebanon ? We are in the process of identifying which brigade will lead the effort. Most likely the Ariete (with the Ariete MBTs and Dardo tracked AIFVs), though the Pozzuolo del Friuli could also be used (in this case it's Centauro 8x8 wheeled tank buster with 6x6 Puma AIFVs similar to your country's VABs). Plus of course artillery and helos (don't know yet if we'll use Mangustas - will you be using Tiger ?)

cheers
 

DoC_FouALieR

New Member
Since I don't know whom regiments are going to Lebanon, I'm not able to tell what equipment will be deployed...
I only wish they are not about to go there with only a few VABs...
But if you Italians are going to deploy your Ariete, it becomes unlikely that our Leclercs will be send.
As for the Tiger, I actually don't know the number in service, but perhaps, the same for the Caesar artillery system.
But it is probable that the VBCI will be deployed, they are quite impatient to play with their new toy!
If not, and considering that the situation can quickly become complicated, AMX-10P and AMX-10 RC will join the party. (the later being a light tank with a 105 mm gun)
 

contedicavour

New Member
DoC_FouALieR said:
Since I don't know whom regiments are going to Lebanon, I'm not able to tell what equipment will be deployed...
I only wish they are not about to go there with only a few VABs...
But if you Italians are going to deploy your Ariete, it becomes unlikely that our Leclercs will be send.
As for the Tiger, I actually don't know the number in service, but perhaps, the same for the Caesar artillery system.
But it is probable that the VBCI will be deployed, they are quite impatient to play with their new toy!
If not, and considering that the situation can quickly become complicated, AMX-10P and AMX-10 RC will join the party. (the later being a light tank with a 105 mm gun)
I wouldn't be surprised if some new equipment were deployed for testing and, to be honest, for some advertisement effort ;) . With the world's TV sets following what will be going on in Lebanon, seeing some good equipment performing well may help exports later on.
Obviously this is a bit shameful since the mission is all about helping civilians, restore peace, deliver food and medicines, but I guess you understand what I mean :rolleyes:
Anyway, if you have news on which regiments and on which ships are going, let me know please.

cheers
 

DoC_FouALieR

New Member
Hmm the first 200 man sent are from the 13th engineering regiment, deploying VABs, and a lot of equipment to clear minefields, for water treatment, electric generator, etc etc..

But the official of the army headquarters have not yet tell what are the two regiment that are going to be sent ..

for some advertisement effort . With the world's TV sets following what will be going on in Lebanon, seeing some good equipment performing well may help exports later on.
I exactly see what you mean! Seeing on TV, for example a VBCI at full speed evacuating people from a crisis area, could be a good advertissement for GIAT...
 

psyclops

New Member
I'll be interested to see how VBCI does on operations; the French have always used a lot of wheeled vehicles, so they may have reason to be confident in their choice to use a wheeled IFV instead of a tracked one. As for Stryker, it certainly is not an IFV, but an APC. In this role, I think it's fine. The OIF vets I've seen talking about it on forums seem quite satisfied with it, noting its high speed (good for chasing after technicals), good ride, and resistance to IED damage (if a wheel gets blown off, it can still limp home, which tracked vehicles can not do). I'm not of the "light is right" ilk, but I'll be keeping an eye out for any AARs or the like from VBCI units.
 

contedicavour

New Member
DoC_FouALieR said:
Hmm the first 200 man sent are from the 13th engineering regiment, deploying VABs, and a lot of equipment to clear minefields, for water treatment, electric generator, etc etc..

But the official of the army headquarters have not yet tell what are the two regiment that are going to be sent ..


I exactly see what you mean! Seeing on TV, for example a VBCI at full speed evacuating people from a crisis area, could be a good advertissement for GIAT...
I've got more news on our deployment. First in will be 1,000 Marines from Lagunari and San Marco regiments. Then as of October the Pozzuolo del Friuli armoured cavalry heavy brigade will take over with 3 of its cavalry regiments (40 Centauro 8x8 120mm and 40 Puma 6x6 for each regiment), plus a couple of Ariete MBT companies (expect 25-30 MBTs) and a lot of Logistics and Engineering people. No information yet on artillery or on attack helos. Total land force : 2,700 people 100% deployed end October.
Strange thing though : after the 1st month, our carrier Garibaldi will go back to Italy, so no air cover. A bit worrying...
I hope your De Gaulle will be around just in case !

cheers
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Couldn't Cyprus be used as an airbase or ist the airbase there too small? As long as I know our Tornados are going to operate from Cyprus.

It looks like there will me much more heavy equipment than I expected.
And we managed to stay out of sending ground troops. On the one hand I think this is good because I do not really see that this operation is going to be short or successfull.
On the other hand it is laughable that our government wants to be a global player but if it comes to do something difficult we send naval, logistic and air units.
 

swerve

Super Moderator

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
Some ground attack capable planes stationed on cyprus should be enough to enshure that air support is available if needed.
Which units of the RAF are normally stationed there?
 

fylr71

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #34
Any necessary air support could be based in Turkey. I know the Turks didn't want the US using their bases in the Iraq war. But this is a peace-keeping operation, and by letting Italy and/or other countries use Turkish air-bases would certainly help their bid to join the EU. If the Turks don't allow use of their bases, then the other options for air support (For Italy) are:

Deploy Garibaldi for more then a month.

Create an interim base in southern Lebanon

Recieve air support from the carriers of other countries involved in the effiort

Also, can the San Giorgio LPDs operate Harriers? If so, then that is another option.
 

old faithful

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Izzy1 said:
As well as a quantity to the Lebanon, Euromissile GmbH also sold at least 200 MILAN rounds and 20 launchers to Syria back in the late 1980s.
as well as to the mujahadeen in afghanistan during the 80,s,the russians found that out!
 

Waylander

Defense Professional
Verified Defense Pro
The Lebanon south of the Litani is not much more tha 80km wide. I would not like to put the airbase of my CAS right into the middle of the crisis region were mortars could hit the airbase every time.
(BTW, is there even an usefull base in th south of Lebanon)
 

swerve

Super Moderator
fylr71 said:
Any necessary air support could be based in Turkey. I know the Turks didn't want the US using their bases in the Iraq war. But this is a peace-keeping operation, and by letting Italy and/or other countries use Turkish air-bases would certainly help their bid to join the EU. If the Turks don't allow use of their bases, then the other options for air support (For Italy) are:

Deploy Garibaldi for more then a month.

Create an interim base in southern Lebanon

Recieve air support from the carriers of other countries involved in the effiort

Also, can the San Giorgio LPDs operate Harriers? If so, then that is another option.
Cyprus is nearer than Turkey. Why not use Akrotiri? It's underused at the moment. No capacity constraints. The RAF put Phantoms & Buccaneers there in the 1980s, & sometimes bases other aircraft there for short periods.
 

contedicavour

New Member
fylr71 said:
Any necessary air support could be based in Turkey. I know the Turks didn't want the US using their bases in the Iraq war. But this is a peace-keeping operation, and by letting Italy and/or other countries use Turkish air-bases would certainly help their bid to join the EU. If the Turks don't allow use of their bases, then the other options for air support (For Italy) are:

Deploy Garibaldi for more then a month.

Create an interim base in southern Lebanon

Recieve air support from the carriers of other countries involved in the effiort

Also, can the San Giorgio LPDs operate Harriers? If so, then that is another option.
The LPDHs can operate Harriers only for emergency air cover missions, with AIM120B and AIM9L and no extra fuel tanks or Paveways. Fuel load would be so limited that the jets can fly 100NM max with no time for loitering above target...
I would definitively opt for Akrotiri in Cyprus, where Tornado IDS can be based.

cheers
 
Top