Pakistan could have 110 N-bombs by year end

[PAF923]

well pakistan's missiles are meant to be a deterrent against india and india's are meant to be a detterent against china.
also icbm's are fully road mobile,placing icbm's in silos makes them vulnerable to attack.:coffee

Recently since India is planning to get 2 more nuclear submarines, in addition to which it already has known as INS Chakara i dont think India would be easy in the treat of China. India understands the threat and is pretty much prepeared for any mis adventure, but know this. China is always the big baby in Asia, and will most likely be in the future.

I think the Indian members here shouldn't worry about any of that stuff, India has money, and thats all you need to get good toys.

 

[aaaditya]

Recently since India is planning to get 2 more nuclear submarines, in addition to which it already has known as INS Chakara i dont think India would be easy in the treat of China. India understands the threat and is pretty much prepeared for any mis adventure, but know this. China is always the big baby in Asia, and will most likely be in the future.

I think the Indian members here shouldn't worry about any of that stuff, India has money, and thats all you need to get good toys.

no one is worried here,i consider it to be a positive development that the three nations have nuclear weapons ,because now all the three can feel secure about their country's defence as a result of the concept of mutually acquired destruction.
i feel that the possession of nuclear weapons have actually encouraged the three countries to actually pursue peace more actively.

 

[kashifshahzad]

no one is worried here,i consider it to be a positive development that the three nations have nuclear weapons ,because now all the three can feel secure about their country's defence as a result of the concept of mutually acquired destruction.
i feel that the possession of nuclear weapons have actually encouraged the three countries to actually pursue peace more actively.

Aaadit I really apriciate your this jesture.
Thats why i think India and Pakistan are delaying their ACs aquirement and they are not worried of anything.But all nations need to spend on their defence and every nation has the right to make developments and become indignous and make exports

 

[aaaditya]

Aaadit I really apriciate your this jesture.
Thats why i think India and Pakistan are delaying their ACs aquirement and they are not worried of anything.But all nations need to spend on their defence and every nation has the right to make developments and become indignous and make exports

i never denied any nations right to develop nuclear weapons,but this should be done after taking the economic development into considerations.
many nations give priority to nuclear and conventional weapons over economic development like for example north korea.
russia also did the same mistake and hence completely broke into peices,the nuclear weapons are a double edged sword if recklessly developed they can hurt you more than your enemy.

 

[kashifshahzad]

i never denied any nations right to develop nuclear weapons,but this should be done after taking the economic development into considerations.
many nations give priority to nuclear and conventional weapons over economic development like for example north korea.
russia also did the same mistake and hence completely broke into peices,the nuclear weapons are a double edged sword if recklessly developed they can hurt you more than your enemy.

But my dear mattey there are severel reasons for a nation to develop nuclear weapons.When a nation decides to make nuclear weapons then it has to decide that whether it should go the strenthen its economy or take off the pressure which would increase in the next comming years then a country just jump to get the nuclear weapon on every price, you can take an exaple of Pakistan,Pakistan did its best to take the nuclear weapons at any price,Pkaistan did this to peel off the pressure from tis neighbour and in this way there is stability in this region and there would happen some minor conflicts but both countries know they can use even a short range ballestic missile ( you purely know the reason why ).
Now you should see the Isreal it is spending 50% of its GDP ( correct me if i am wrong ) because Isreal thinks that it is in danger and it would do any thing to make its defence stronger and stronger.You can take north Korea in the same example.
Aaaditya i differ from your this example that a country must see its economic conditions before getting the nukes,man a country having healthier economy and not having any enemy why should it try to get the nukes and there are a dozen of treaties now for the non poliferation of nukes Lol:

 

[aaaditya]

But my dear mattey there are severel reasons for a nation to develop nuclear weapons.When a nation decides to make nuclear weapons then it has to decide that whether it should go the strenthen its economy or take off the pressure which would increase in the next comming years then a country just jump to get the nuclear weapon on every price, you can take an exaple of Pakistan,Pakistan did its best to take the nuclear weapons at any price,Pkaistan did this to peel off the pressure from tis neighbour and in this way there is stability in this region and there would happen some minor conflicts but both countries know they can use even a short range ballestic missile ( you purely know the reason why ).
Now you should see the Isreal it is spending 50% of its GDP ( correct me if i am wrong ) because Isreal thinks that it is in danger and it would do any thing to make its defence stronger and stronger.You can take north Korea in the same example.
Aaaditya i differ from your this example that a country must see its economic conditions before getting the nukes,man a country having healthier economy and not having any enemy why should it try to get the nukes and there are a dozen of treaties now for the non poliferation of nukes Lol:

my dear kashif even if pakistan develops nuclear weapons ,they will still have to spend huge amounts of money to maintain and safeguard them,waste disposal etc,the nuclear material used for the weapons have a certain half life period after which they have to be disposed off.
and if pakistan uses them in war it will assure destruction of their enemies as well as their own totald estruction, a strong economy also enable to absorb the shock of a nuclear atatck.

take for example japan,the first two nuclear bombs were dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki,millions of people died but within 10 years japan had again become economically very strong and within another 10 years they became the number one economy in asia.
japan has more reasons for having nuclear weapons than pakistan,pakistan has only india as its rival ,but japan has two hostile and nuclear neighbours in china and north korea ,but japan has concentrated on its economy rather than the development of nuclear,they know very well.
that any country which uses nuclear bomb first will become an international untouchable.
the entire world's sympathy and support will be with the effected country,this the main reason why i believe that neither india nor pakistan will dare to use their nuclear weapons first as it will politically and economically isolate them .
the only value of the nuclear weapons is mutually assured destruction.

 

[kashifshahzad]

my dear kashif even if pakistan develops nuclear weapons ,they will still have to spend huge amounts of money to maintain and safeguard them,waste disposal etc,the nuclear material used for the weapons have a certain half life period after which they have to be disposed off.
and if pakistan uses them in war it will assure destruction of their enemies as well as their own totald estruction, a strong economy also enable to absorb the shock of a nuclear atatck.

take for example japan,the first two nuclear bombs were dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki,millions of people died but within 10 years japan had again become economically very strong and within another 10 years they became the number one economy in asia.
japan has more reasons for having nuclear weapons than pakistan,pakistan has only india as its rival ,but japan has two hostile and nuclear neighbours in china and north korea ,but japan has concentrated on its economy rather than the development of nuclear,they know very well.
that any country which uses nuclear bomb first will become an international untouchable.
the entire world's sympathy and support will be with the effected country,this the main reason why i believe that neither india nor pakistan will dare to use their nuclear weapons first as it will politically and economically isolate them .
the only value of the nuclear weapons is mutually assured destruction.

But my dear mattey China didnt dropped nukes on Japan and Japan did know that it cant compete with US and Japan prefered peace it didnt tried to make the nukes.And Japan didnt had the mean to drop the nukes when they will aquire the nukes then why should Japan try to make nukes.That was surely good decision taken by the Japnees and they saved a lot of money which was to be spend on the defence in the severel years.Now Japan want to have a standing Army and now Japan can afford its defence expenditure but now one can say that Japan would be a bigger buyer of defencive equipments.

 

[webmaster]

"if pakistan develops" ?

Pakistan has nuclear weapons... end of the question. I don't see this debate going anywhere but in circles. Locked until further notice.