Gripen is said to have a 10 mins turnaround time to land - refuel- quick aircraft systems check - reload and take off for next misson
Does the F16 have a similar timing like Gripen ? in a war this could prove critical ......
Capability comes from people first, organization second, training third and platform last. Any tertiary air force has the significant capabilities for air power generation, which means that ability to reload and rearm their aircraft in a short time. In fact, it is common to have competitions amongst different air crew to reload and rearm aircraft.
Further, since this is a thread on the PAF, stick to the topic - do not further derail the thread with your concerns on the Gripen, which is not an aircraft in PAF inventory. While we encourage detailed comparison of weapon systems, we do not encourage "weapon A vs. weapon B" comparisons (and if you read the Forum Rules, you would know that).
BTW, Taiwan and Singapore also train their pilots to take off and land on public roads on a regular basis and some of these videos have been posted. Both countries maintain integrated IADS, hardened aircraft shelters (either underground or built-into the side of a mountain) and the capability to operate on public roads (which is not platform specific) because of the possibility that our air fields may be attacked at a time of war - this also means the ability to arm and refuel them off base. And before you ask, hot refueling (refuelling a plane with the engine on) is not an usual capability for tertiary air forces.
Here's a video of a range of Taiwanese aircraft (F-16s, Mirage 2000-5s and AIDC F-CK-1 Ching-kuos) taking off from a highway your viewing pleasure:
[nomedia]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNk-ljy-diA&feature=related[/nomedia]
Here's another video, with Singapore F-16s taking off from a road in Ex Torrent (there's even other videos of F-5Ss and E-2Cs taking-off and landing on a road from the YouTube user, Pirate too):
[nomedia]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnkNaF45BK0[/nomedia]
Your posts have consistently shown a lack basic knowledge that can be acquired reading information that is already contained in DT. It's clear that you don't even read the threads that you post in. If you did, you would know more about the aircraft you are posting about. Please spend a day or two reading the threads you post in before drafting error prone posts - this particularly applies to your posts in the Indian Air Force thread. You have a habit posting unsupported fan-boy type of opinions with glaring factual errors. This would not have occurred if you read the thread or did some basic fact checking.
A word of advice: Change your habits and read the
Forum Rules (which you have obviously not read), otherwise, you will find that other forum members will start ignoring your posts and the Mods will start paying undue attention to your posts. I'm also now telling you to include links on every 'fact' that you post, as a means of quality control. Kindly demonstrate greater maturity as your post count increases.