You'll tend to find though even some serving pers will make some rubbish claims off even a single experience purely for the sake of complaining, hard to please everyone. The fact this guy is comparing it to an SLR is also alittle strange considering we have not used that rifle for essentially a generation which either makes him a pretty old serving per, used it a handful of times in the navy or is just going off the brochure but either way comparing red apples to green apples, a NZLAV is also heavier than an M113 but would'nt exactly consider that a valid complaint in the scheme of things either.
The person making the comment about the SLR may never have even seen one and still know that it weighs 5kg.
I am a bit dumbfounded that the MARS weighs 5.7 kg.....is that correct?
From what I can find out it states that the LMT service rifle weighs 3.3 kg unloaded, so the 5.7kg must have the M203/as well....?
Which you can't compare to an SLR.
I have used the SLR,F88,M16A1 and A2, M203, and a few exotics.
The SLR was my favorite in open/savanna country, but an M203 would have been a very close 2nd.
I never really warmed to the F88.
I found the design of the safety, trigger guard fairly unsuitable for our conditions, and magazine changes were also an issue for me.
Its not a terrible weapon, it has a few advantages, but I'm not a great fan of bullpup rifles for infantry soldiers. Truckies, SIG's, field engineers, arty etc, for sure. So I guess if you had to equip an army, then, the infantry get what they are given. For the record, I had a small role in the SARP project, which ultimately chose the Styer, even though it wasn't our first choice. (Our, being infantry)
I was already aware of the firing pin problem, the whole batch of pins were replaced.
All 10,000 of them.