LCA is good example for indirgenious production but now this plane is getting old.New Fighter needs india Air Force.
I am sorry, what are you trying to say? New fighter does not need IAF, its other way around.
LCA is good example for indirgenious production but now this plane is getting old.New Fighter needs india Air Force.
Ok bit of a history.
Originally there was NO MRCA competition. IAF wanted Mirage 2000 period. Negotiations were almost completed to set up local manufacturing. (No tender/multi vendor evaluations required as per Indian law if they want something already in inventory). Then our politicians hit upon a brilliant idea of holding a competition, enter Russians, Swedes and Americans. Then 20 T limit was removed so that F-18, Typhoon can also compete. By this time French were getting desperate, Rafale not winning any export order and keeping the Mirage 2000 line open in anticipation of Indian order was costly, M2K was withdrawn and Rafale was offered. Then comes the nuclear deal, F-18 is suddenly front runner. AESA is the magic word. RFP was rumored to specify it. Russian hastily put together Zhuk AE AESA in time for the Aeroindia 07.
Sigh...the sorry saga continues.
What IAF wanted? Mirage 2000, period. What they will get? F-18 or Mig-35.
LCA is good example for indirgenious production but now this plane is getting old.New Fighter needs india Air Force.
from a technological point of view the lca project is relatively new ,since the development actually started in the 90's,it's been in development for 15 years ,the ef2000 and the french rafale have also had similiar development times,but with some crashes.
The original 2005 requirement may give an insight to their thinking. remember that man hours are cheaper in India, and if the percentage carried out in India is high then low cost/higher maintenance aircraft from Russia are in with a real chance.
The Gripen is also fairly cheap and quite capable, and is also low maintenance, so thats quite attractive.
The recent addition of Typhoon Rafale and F18 are interesting, these are in with a chance, but they were not being actively considered 2 years ago, whatever change the Indians minds?? has there been an increase in threat in the last two years that India feels it should be able to counter?.
Has the Pakistani air power increased lately? or has Pakistan been talking about upgrading?, these may have a bearing on India decision.
Does India think it needs some technological transfer from outside for its own industry?, if so the transfer of technology takes on great importance, which manufacturer will give India the areas of needed technology?.
What does India want? engine technology?, Avionics, production or design? I would suggest software isn't a problem for India, which areas do indians think they are behind and which are they leaders?.
Cheers
The announcement today that Australia is buying 24 Super Hornets ,its first export success, will not harm its prospects . I do not know how strong the Indian rupia is, but the cost to Oz of $6bill over 10 years might send the Indian experts quickly to their currency calculators. I know the figure covers more than just the plane itself but it is a lot of money, maybe the Indians have plenty.An in-service AESA radar system is apparently a "key" requirement for India's MRCA. Hence the new push for the F/A-18E/F for India. The fact that we've just bought it and Malaysia is still strongly considering it, may also help...
they certainly have and i dont believe a last generation fighter aircraft is what they will spend it on......The announcement today that Australia is buying 24 Super Hornets ,its first export success, will not harm its prospects . I do not know how strong the Indian rupia is, but the cost to Oz of $6bill over 10 years might send the Indian experts quickly to their currency calculators. I know the figure covers more than just the plane itself but it is a lot of money, maybe the Indians have plenty.
The announcement today that Australia is buying 24 Super Hornets ,its first export success, will not harm its prospects . I do not know how strong the Indian rupia is, but the cost to Oz of $6bill over 10 years might send the Indian experts quickly to their currency calculators. I know the figure covers more than just the plane itself but it is a lot of money, maybe the Indians have plenty.
It's 6 billion Australian dollars, which is fewer rupees than the same number of US dollars.
Thanks for clarifying, I almost fell of the chair thinking $6 billion for 24 F-18s.. Does the Australian contract includes extended spares/logistics support too? (like the Canadian contract for C-17s).
The announcement today that Australia is buying 24 Super Hornets ,its first export success, will not harm its prospects . I do not know how strong the Indian rupia is, but the cost to Oz of $6bill over 10 years might send the Indian experts quickly to their currency calculators. I know the figure covers more than just the plane itself but it is a lot of money, maybe the Indians have plenty.
Thanks for clarifying, I almost fell of the chair thinking $6 billion for 24 F-18s.. Does the Australian contract includes extended spares/logistics support too? (like the Canadian contract for C-17s).
from a technological point of view the lca project is relatively new ,since the development actually started in the 90's,it's been in development for 15 years ,the ef2000 and the french rafale have also had similiar development times,but with some crashes.
No offence intented!
Ef2000 and Rafale are built by, Manufacturers with significant Experience in constructing Jets. We’ll need to give the Indian industry sometime before it matures, its capability. I'm sure there's plenty of capability, just need to pull it together!
Hence Comparing EF vs LCA is not fare!
hey guys check out these interesting articles on the mig35 and the zhuk aesa radars,the links also contain images of these and particularly the mig35 cockpit looks quite modern.
here are the links:
http://www.defense-update.com/products/m/mig35.htm
http://www.defense-update.com/features/du-1-07/aesaradar_zhuk_AE.htm