WRT a potential C-5M replacement, perhaps some kind of licensing arrangement between a Western aerospace company and Antonov might work. Otherwise a C-17 replacement only is likely the only affordable option.
I am not sure what could be gained with that. Antonov hasn’t delivered a new AN125 in over 20 years. Yes they have ambitions to restore an AN225 but have yet to do so. We have no idea the conditions of their tooling and documentation for such.
True, but a Westernized An124 might be faster and cheaper than a C-5M replacement. As for the An225, too big and really no market...nevertheless an impressive beast! What's the best solution for backing up the C-17 fleet? I think this will be needed based on the demands being placed on American, Canadian, UK, and Australian operators (perhaps others as well).
Agree, a C-5M replacement isn't a priority but the current fleet is 20+% strategic lift. The C-17 fleet usage rate, that is a concern, which would have been best addressed by USAF and allies placing orders to prolong the production line...water under the bridge now. WRT the An-124, perhaps an Airbus relationship makes more sense from a EU doing more perspective. As you say though, is Antonov in a position to really assist?
Even if the Tooling and facilities of the C17 had been preserved, the biggest problem for it is the Engines. The C17A uses F117 (not to be confused with the Stealth bomber) engines. Derived from the P&W 2000 series. That series also powered the 757. It’s out of production. So a C17R would be needing new engines. This is a sticking point on an NMA too as well as a modern An124
Yes again, another hurdle, as the RR engine replacement for the B-52J.
In the RR F130 they have an engine that is close to the original TF33 in terms of diameter and thrust. In the case of the F117/P&W2000 it was a unique class of engines. The only equals being the RB211 and the PS90. The closest in size would be a step down in power to the CFM LEAP or P&W1100. Unless they transition to a twin engine. Which isn’t a hurdle it’s a complete redesign.
More proof that the USAF has abandoned its official aircraft designation system.
Air Force weighing turning T-7 into F-7 armed light attack jet: Official - Breaking Defense
Despite not talking to Boeing about development of a F-7 armed light attack aircraft based off the T-7A Red Hawk, a USAF official has revealed the service is interested in such a concept, and could look to replace older F-16s with it.breakingdefense.com
With regard to your question regarding the T7 the short answer is yes. The USAF are believed to be exploring options for the T7 to replace the F16, it will be dubbed the F7 if it goes ahead
Export version of the Chengdu J-7....
armyrecognition.com
armyrecognition.com
peru21.pe
The aircraft on top of the image reminds me to the Bell X-1 (fuselage and nose). Coincidence or did they choose for a "retro-design"?
