Grand Danois
Entertainer
IIRC, the Danish side has qualified for 8 or 9 out of the 10 last EC's/WC's.Like you qualified for the World Cup?
(Shame on me for this joke... :loony )
That is an excellent record.
Remember '92 perchance? :
IIRC, the Danish side has qualified for 8 or 9 out of the 10 last EC's/WC's.Like you qualified for the World Cup?
(Shame on me for this joke... :loony )
I wouldn't quite kill it, you still have the Australians, British, and Canadian Forces in A-stan. Not to mention that we would then send 2000+ troops to join that 2000 surplus redeployed there.Again.
There are ca. 1500-2000 US troops in the Kosovo.
According to your plan these troops are relocated to A-stan.
There we have 3500 germans in the north and a bunch of smaller detachements from other nations.
Those should leave A-stan and go to Kosovo.
So you have a hole of ca. 4000 troops in the north of A-stan.
You get max. 2000 US troops out of Kosovo to fill this hole.
You would need less troops than we do due to multinational forces tend to be tail heavier but this won't be enough.
So by performing your plan you get not even enough troops for the hole in the north not to talk of freeing up additonal troops for the south. And you kill the multinational idea of ISAF.
It wouldn't degenerate it because you still have more than one NATO country engaged in a conflict, therefore its still a multinational coalition. And yes the U.S. would need more troops to fill in the spaces but of course 2000+ troops is still fairly easy for us to handle.And what is the point in this? You would still need more troops to fill the holes and seriously degenerate the multinational idea.
For what?
We would gain more control of the mission, and the fact of Americans not being liked in the region can easily change. We simply need to employ a program of winning "Hearts and Minds".But I ask again what would you gain?
You need more troops than now and you weaken the multinational character of the ISAF and KFOR missions.
BTW, the americans are not that well liked also in the north of A-stan.
Your in a difficult situation Pal, the Serbs don't have much of a future in Kosovo.What is sure is that a lot of Serbian people (who had enough) will leave Kosovo after declaring independence, but mostly of us will stay. But after that, with a various scenarios avaleable will KFOR be able to protect Serbs, then, and what KFOR will do for Serbian safety in longer period???
Very interesting, I will keep that in mind. Any suggestion how that state should be called?Your in a difficult situation Pal, the Serbs don't have much of a future in Kosovo.
Heres a suggestion though, sit tight and declare independence from Kosovo, at least that way you will get to keep your homes.
Hi Generalissimo, I live in Kosovo on the mountain on the Macedonian border.Kosovo=Serbia, I am an American, and I want to help heal some of the dislike between our countries here by saying that although I support Kosovo's independence and really disapprove of the US Embassy incident, I sympathize with the fact that you had part of your country taken and never got a say in it. Do you actually live in Kosovo or in Serbia proper? IIRC Mistiricova is in Kosovo.
Really the best thing that the Kosovar Serbs could do for themselves is declare Northern Kosovo independent in a nonviolent manner and then announce reunion with Serbia. Then you have peaceful separation of Serbs and Albanians.
Dear mysterious, you should know that BBC is nothing more than propaganda machine. They are not lie of course, but their true is kind of dimmed, their reports are everything else than objectively.Very interesting analysis done by BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7260283.stm
If the Serb majority in Northern Kosovo are going to continue to provoke & attack UN forces & other places they need to be restrained. Radical Serbian nationalism has only bore bad news for the Balkans since the post-War years.
The Int'l Community should've let parts of Northern Kosovo that have Serbs as majority join Serbia proper in exchange for making Presevo valley in Serbia proper to join Kosovo where the majority are ethnic Albanians.
First we don't look for benefit, we look for justice.Could you perhaps help me understand something.
Aside from the legallity of the whole situation, why does Serbia want Kosovo so bad? Why would you want something that doesn't want to belong to you and is sure to cause trouble in the future, what's the benefit of that?
Yeah it sound simple, but of course is little more complicated, first I am not sure that will be allowed by UN, because Kosovo is Serbian province under UNIf the Russians are indeed right that this annexation is a breach of international law and Kosovo is still part of Serbia. If Serbia asks for Russian assistance (Peacekeeping) in Serbian territories Russian troops can legally enter Kosovo under international law and take control of security (Peacekeeping).
The EU would have to leave otherwise if they engage Russian forces, one the EU have declared war on Russia and secondly they have no legal basis for such aggression.
If Russia wants Kosovo as part of Serbia and the Russian/Serbian alliance they will take it, simple as that.
What economic benefit? Kosovo does not have enough electricity power,Kosovo will become a safe haven and staging point for extremism in greater Serbia and possibly cause problems in Chechnya. Once the promises of greater economic benefits and the illusion of democracy fails.
i always wonder would a majore war happen becouse of a new state in the balkans