Indo-Pakistani Tensions (2019 & Beyond)

ngatimozart

Super Moderator
Staff member
Verified Defense Pro
Here’s TWZ’s take on all this. The article includes an unconfirmed French remark that a Rafale was lost.

Regardless, this skirmish is a win for future Chinese aviation arms exports. Military observers will be watching this carefully to monitor any new Chinese capabilities that might appear.

If the Chinese, platforms, weapons, and other systems work well during this conflict, they have a good possibility of replacing Russia in the weapons market. The performance of Russian equipment in the Russo-Ukrainian War hasn't been helpful for their marketing, and the skills of their military leadership has left a lot to be desired. That to is unhelpful for marketing.
 

SABRE

Super Moderator
Verified Defense Pro
There are reports of a Pakistan AWACs being shot down.
Clearly fake

For that so far seems the claim on aircraft down only reliable enough for 2 or perhaps 3 on Indian side. I do believe more IAF and PAF aircraft down, but so far still unreliable claim. Both reportedly bring up to 125 fighters plus AEW&C assets, thus more aircraft downs in my opinion very probable from both sides.
Asides for the 5 kills of 7th May, PAF has not yet laid a claims to more kills in the air. It has, however, claimed neutralizing an S-400 system via JF-17. I think whatever kills or claims there are by PAF in today's ops, DG ISPR will be giving electronic evidence of it during his briefing.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group


Well India and Pakistan basically put opposite side on lies and missinfirmation. Also both official channel accuse each other as the one that continue to escalate.

Personally for me (correct me if I'm wrong on reading this), after IAF vs PAF skirmish two days ago, both now using mostly Drones and Missiles to increase the attacks toward each others AB. If the number of 125 aircraft involve is confirm, then it is the largest air skirmish on one occasion. Perhaps since perhaps Yom Kippur ? (Newsweek claim largest since WW2 if number involve confirm).

 
Last edited:

Ananda

The Bunker Group




Seems there will be ceasefire soon. Both India and Pakistan foreign ministry sources indicate that. However Trump also say that to the media. Seems this is something that Trump going to say; 'I bring this ceasefire to both of them' or 'if Biden still President, there will be war in subcontinent'.
 
Last edited:

Big_Zucchini

Well-Known Member
By now, if the war was heading to escalation, we'd see that. It started low, peaked for a few hours, and died down again. So let's talk results:

Pakistan:
Got a few operational successes, but needs to mostly worry about over-confidence and possibly learning the wrong lessons.
They should study why they succeeded, the press harder in that direction.
Being tied to China for a qualitative advantage which China achieved only recently, Pakistan should decide whether to double down on its relationship with China and strive for access to better platforms and weapons, and in turn provide new contributions.


India:
Really needs to do its homework now. Its decision to only strike terrorist sites in the beginning at the (materialized) risk of quality and non-attritable platforms, and allow Pakistan to prepare its forces, has been a serious miscalculation.
It lost a lot, for little to no gain.


And the biggest loser of all this..... is Taiwan.
China had just validated its systems in real combat against western equivalents.
Taiwan may thus end up in a state of not only quantitative inferiority, but a qualitative one as well.
 

John Fedup

The Bunker Group
By now, if the war was heading to escalation, we'd see that. It started low, peaked for a few hours, and died down again. So let's talk results:

Pakistan:
Got a few operational successes, but needs to mostly worry about over-confidence and possibly learning the wrong lessons.
They should study why they succeeded, the press harder in that direction.
Being tied to China for a qualitative advantage which China achieved only recently, Pakistan should decide whether to double down on its relationship with China and strive for access to better platforms and weapons, and in turn provide new contributions.


India:
Really needs to do its homework now. Its decision to only strike terrorist sites in the beginning at the (materialized) risk of quality and non-attritable platforms, and allow Pakistan to prepare its forces, has been a serious miscalculation.
It lost a lot, for little to no gain.


And the biggest loser of all this..... is Taiwan.
China had just validated its systems in real combat against western equivalents.
Taiwan may thus end up in a state of not only quantitative inferiority, but a qualitative one as well.
I think more analysts on the weapons performance is required to confirm Chinese equivalence. Better tactics and training by Pakistan (with Chinese input) could be a factor. WRT Taiwan, agree, and there is the proximity factor, perhaps the biggest problem for Taiwan.
 

PachkaSigaret

New Member
Sporadic fighting is still very much ongoing.

Pakistan:
Got a few operational successes, but needs to mostly worry about over-confidence and possibly learning the wrong lessons.
They should study why they succeeded, the press harder in that direction.
Being tied to China for a qualitative advantage which China achieved only recently, Pakistan should decide whether to double down on its relationship with China and strive for access to better platforms and weapons, and in turn provide new contributions.


India:
Really needs to do its homework now. Its decision to only strike terrorist sites in the beginning at the (materialized) risk of quality and non-attritable platforms, and allow Pakistan to prepare its forces, has been a serious miscalculation.
It lost a lot, for little to no gain.
China and Pakistan have had very close ties for a while now. They've made it a point to source a variety of equipment from China like the VT-4, A-100, ect. in conjunction with a variety of aircraft.

To be fair to India, I think there target selection bore in mind preventing further serious escalation. They expected Pakistan to respond. It seems to me they were very selective with targeting, both sides have show restraint all things considering. They quickly targeted airfields, cross border drone raids and varied up targets. So they didn't merely just strike terrorist compounds. We're not going to get a decent BDA anytime soon and probably not a very clear one at all in the foreseeable future.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group

Despite accusations of violations from India and Pakistan against each other, so far seems the truce hold the uneasy calm. Seems Trump got diplomatic boost, as both Modi and Syarif thank and appreciate Trump on his effort to broker the truce.
 

StingrayOZ

Super Moderator
Staff member

Despite accusations of violations from India and Pakistan against each other, so far seems the truce hold the uneasy calm. Seems Trump got diplomatic boost, as both Modi and Syarif thank and appreciate Trump on his effort to broker the truce.
The US is still ultra important in international relations. There are some problems that are best facilitated and negotiated through them. Pakistan and India is an example of that. Particularly as India and China are still cooling offer after their latest border skirmish, and Russia is fighting a war in Ukraine.

I'm curious to see how this plays out.
 

Ananda

The Bunker Group
The US is still ultra important in international relations.
No doubt about that, yesterday I saw images of Zelensky and British, German, French and Polish leaders hovering speaker phone, listening to Trump. No matter how he antics behavior and policy, he still US President, and that's what matters.

The graphic in that Al Jazeera article also interest me. China is Pakistan biggest defense suppliers, while Russia in opposite situation for India. US not on any possition as big supplier for any of them in recent time. Perhaps that's also put them as in more neutral possition for New Delhi and Islamabad. India used to see US in different way especially when US still Pakistan main weapon supplier. For Pakistan despite US getting closer to India, they still need US good side to balance growing influence of Indian Lobby in US.

India getting closer to Israel seems also helping their lobby influence. The Pakistan and India also seems become part of Israel vs Turkey diplomatic rivalry. Turkiye increasingly become Pakistan important defense supplier, while Israel already for some time in India side.

So yes, I believe what happen between India and Pakistan always play increasingly important to many Global Players. However as long as problem of Khasmir and for that matter Industri river main tributaries water supply not resolve, the tension will always be there.
 
Top