Indeed, she has made her presence felt and demonstrated the value of carrier-based air power.I
For all its faults it has been a busy carrier since it has been commissioned, and it is the only carrier outside of US service that can handle Hawkeyes.
Indeed, she has made her presence felt and demonstrated the value of carrier-based air power.I
For all its faults it has been a busy carrier since it has been commissioned, and it is the only carrier outside of US service that can handle Hawkeyes.
You'd have thought that was a shoe-in - Shar2's nose was a bit bigger than Shar1, more room, less hassle - a lot of the harness and stuff would have been similar/same.Yes, they'd need a beefed-up version of those old British catapults - but they existed, & were used by the RN to launch fully-laden F-4Ks & Buccaneers. AFAIK the design drawings still exist for all the models.
Absolutely. And that Israeli kit had already been ordered for the IN's older Sea Harriers when India decided that the ex-RN SHARs were useless without Blue Vixen & AIM-120. Doh! Somehow, even opening negotiations with the Israelis on doing the same for the ex-RAN airframes was too difficult. Amazing.
Assuming you meant ex-RN airframes...Absolutely. And that Israeli kit had already been ordered for the IN's older Sea Harriers when India decided that the ex-RN SHARs were useless without Blue Vixen & AIM-120. Doh! Somehow, even opening negotiations with the Israelis on doing the same for the ex-RAN airframes was too difficult. Amazing.
I am also sure India has the worst accident rate of any Harrier user as well.You'd have thought that was a shoe-in - Shar2's nose was a bit bigger than Shar1, more room, less hassle - a lot of the harness and stuff would have been similar/same.
Ah well - as far as I understand it the Indian Shar's have been languishing due to a lack of spares with few hours flown anyway.
Oops! Finger/brain disconnect.Assuming you meant ex-RN airframes...:....
So in theory, Sea Gripens would be viable for the Navy for the lifetimes of both INS Vikramaditya & the future INS Vikrant under construction, but also for the even further into the future INS Vishal which may or may not use cats.Further to the opportunities afforded by the F-X2 deal, the source told IHS Jane's that discussions with India have been taking place behind the scenes. "There has been a conversation with the Indian Navy, which is looking at the Sea Gripen separate to the [Indian Air Force] MMRCA [Medium MultiRole Combat Aircraft requirement]," he said, adding: "The Indian Navy [interest in Sea Gripen] never went away."
...
As Saab is pitching the Sea Gripen for 'short take-off, but arrested recovery' (STOBAR) operations, it does not need to be equipped with the nosewheel-mounted launch bar required for 'catapult-assisted take-off, but arrested recovery' (CATOBAR) ships. As such, it could operate from both types of carriers, making it a suitable option for the Indian Navy's STOBAR ships INS Viraat and INS Vikramaditya , and future indigenous carrier; as well as the Brazilian Navy's CATOBAR Sao Paulo (it should be noted that the lack of a 'ski jump' on this ship might present issues in terms of the Sea Gripen's maximum take-off weight).
This doesn't make sense. The IN is slated to buy a naval variant of the Tejas as well as MiG-29K. A third model of the same type of plane doesn't make much sense.So in theory, Sea Gripens would be viable for the Navy for the lifetimes of both INS Vikramaditya & the future INS Vikrant under construction, but also for the even further into the future INS Vishal which may or may not use cats.
Interesting, but not realistic, they've bought MiG-29K's for the medium term for STOBAR ops. Plus, i'm fairly sure that wouldn't there need to be some undercarriage strengthening for catapult launches, so it's not such an easy transition as it would appear?
Ah, but this is IndiaThis doesn't make sense. The IN is slated to buy a naval variant of the Tejas as well as MiG-29K. A third model of the same type of plane doesn't make much sense.
Then again India also has a track record for having fall back solutions when their domestic projects face delays or have performance issues. The Sea Gripen, or even the Gripen could be such a fall back option for the Tejas.Ah, but this is India
Be interesting - I suppose the LCA and Gripen both use the same engine, or a very close relative. Not sure where that'd leave the 29K's tho..
Nah, even for India's procurement strategy..bit of a stretch.
India Navy Legendary Aircraft carrier has entered into area of Operation in north Westren Arabian Sea Accompanied by other three vessels...
Though it Commissioned along back into Indian Navy It took a long time to reach Indian Shores..
As per entry above She has sailed non-stop from 8th December from Murmansk and has been joined by various IN vessels along the ways finally entered India's maritime borders as part of 12 vessel flotilla. Less than a month from when it started. Shes home nowAfter commissioning, the carrier began a non-stop 8500 nautical mile journey to its homeport at INS Kadamba, Karwar, from Severodvinsk on 27 November 2013.[13] It is under the command of Commodore Suraj Berry, who is her first Indian captain.[69] Apart from her Indian crew, she also carried 177 Russian specialists from Sevmash, who will remain on-board for one year, as part of the 20-year post-warranty services contract with the shipyard. During the journey, it encountered a storm in the Barents Sea and finally dropped anchor in Kola Bay, off the port of Murmansk on 1 December, which is 215 nautical miles away from Severodvinsk. Here, she linked up with her escorts, frigate INS Trikand and fleet tanker INS Deepak, was refueled and left the port on 8 December.[72] The group was escorted by HMS Monmouth of the Royal Navy while passing through the English Channel,[73] and was joined by destroyer INS Delhi near Gibraltar.[13]
The flotilla sailed in the Mediterranean sea, crossed the Suez Canal, and then the Red Sea.[70][74] On 1 January 2014, she entered the Arabian Sea near the Gulf of Aden, and was received by a flotilla from the Indian Navy's Western fleet led by the fleet commander Rear Admiral Anil Chawla.[75] The flotilla was composed of the aircraft carrier INS Viraat, two Delhi-class destroyers, three Talwar-class frigates, a Godavari-class frigate and a couple of offshore patrol vessels.[13]
INS Vikramaditya (R33) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From what i have read in the news earlier, IIRC the issue was two pronged, the conversion of the ship into a Maritime Museum - CapEx issues; and the issue of finding a permanent berth for it to be used as a Museum, in both cases i think the Mumbai municipal corporation has not been able to invest/resolve the issues. The Navy on its part has been funding the upkeep so far.The country’s first aircraft carrier, INS Vikrant (R11) a Warrior of sea who made INDIA victorious in 1971 was a Majestic class aircraft carrier of the Indian Navy.
She played a key role in enforcing the naval blockade on East Pakistan during the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971. This Ship has decommissioned in 1997 and preserved as Museum .
Indian Navy Admiral declared that they are going sell this Legendary Ship in Auction in this month... they took this decision just because they are unable to bear the cost of its maintenance and that too they are going to sell it for Rs 3.1 Cr..
Is Indian Defense Ministry facing such financial crisis , they are unable to maintain an legendary retired Air craft Carrier ??
As per news reports the DAC (Defence Acquisition Council) Chaired by the Defence Minister has cleared a multitude of projects including the announcement of the plan to build 6 new submarines in India. Apart from the submarines two SDV have also been cleared for the Navy MARCOS Commandos.Rs 80,000 crore worth defence projects cleared, 6 submarines to be built in India
NEW DELHI: Defence projects worth a whopping Rs 80,000 crore were on Saturday cleared by the government which decided that six submarines will be made indigenously.
Rs 80,000 crore worth defence projects cleared, 6 submarines to be built in India - The Times of India
Perhaps the cost includes the development of infrastructure at shipyards to enable the construction these boats. The next step in the action plan is to review shipyards in the country in the next 6 to 8 weeks and prepare and submit a report basis which a RFP will be issued to a specific shipyard. However i still think the budgeting is high, though the RFP and the negotiation for the same will define the final price.Germany buys it's U212A Block II for roughly 500 million EUR per boat IIRC. That's 630 million in USD.
Even including development coasts divided by six boats this seems overly expensive for a conventional AIP boat.