Trade, peaceful interaction, a softer approach, and patience...It would also be completely unacceptable to the people of the Falkland Islands themselves. Who overwhelmingly consider them selves to be British
Trade, peaceful interaction, a softer approach, and patience...It would also be completely unacceptable to the people of the Falkland Islands themselves. Who overwhelmingly consider them selves to be British
It's not all about money, & it never has been. Oil is now an issue, but for many years Argentina pushed its claim despite the expectation that the Falklands would cost it money if ceded. Before 1982, Argentina provided some indirect subsidies to the islanders, e.g. by providing them with subsidised flights to Argentina - their only air link to the rest of the world at the time....
the fact the 3000 people who live in the falklands are British going back many generations and over 170+ years its there home, this doesnt mean any thing to Argentina its all about money, .
Hi swerve , i did not mean its always been about the money but the recent up scale in Argentinas effort to bully the islanders , must have some thing to do with the possible rich oil feilds and the possiblity of other countries having a stake in them example the US, this would make the argument more complicated from there point of view, and they also want to show there strength to the rest of South America,It's not all about money, & it never has been. Oil is now an issue, but for many years Argentina pushed its claim despite the expectation that the Falklands would cost it money if ceded. Before 1982, Argentina provided some indirect subsidies to the islanders, e.g. by providing them with subsidised flights to Argentina - their only air link to the rest of the world at the time.
hi exprivate , i have got to say if every country still wanted to fight the old wars of hundreds of years ago the world would be at war constantly,Gentlemen,
I have always sided with the Brits in this dispute, still I think that the arguments and are strikingly similar on both sides. When Brits are talking about Argie aggression, they are considering 1982 but when Argies talk about Brits` agression they have in mind not only the Falkland situation but also the events in Rio de La Plata in 1806-1807. Then we have the common accusations of colonialism, and later the accusations that the other side is distracting the attention from the severe economic problems in the country, etc.
The really strong point of Britain is the right of self determination. And the military superiority, of course. The last one is usually abouth 90% of the judicial, historic and other argument. :ar15
The sad but glaring truth is through every one on this thread has acted responsibly and used reasonable and logical arguments about this situation in the South Atlantic, this rational approach does not apply for this situation and will not work. The single issue that cannot ever be approached rationally and cannot be negotiated away reasonably is something deeper and completely irrational. And now I will tell you what it is.hi exprivate , i have got to say if every country still wanted to fight the old wars of hundreds of years ago the world would be at war constantly,
I think theres abit of difference between a conflict 30 years ago and 205-6 years ago, and remember we didnt even want the 82 falklands conflict , it was forced on to us by Argentina, i think if thats what Argentina is thinking then they need to let it go, as old enemies can become friends look at the UK we fought wars with france for 100s of years but we are at peace and are close friends and allies same with Germany these are just an example, the world has moved on,,,,,,,
Argentina as approached this totaly the wrong way ,Its tried to show its teeth when talking about it could of worked out better, But the UK will never back down to a bully not now not ever......
Of course, the UK has been called the 'aggressor' in this instance when AFAIK the sub which will be going to the Falklands is a Trafalgar class sub and NOT a Vanguard class.And today, very strangely, the Argentinian foreign minister waved a photograph of a submarine and claimed the Vanguard was in the South Atlantic.
I despair.
And of course Britain really would take a highly valuable strategic asset holding a high percentage of our nuclear deterrent and send it away from the well defended bastion areas it usually patrols in, into an area with little friendly support.And today, very strangely, the Argentinian foreign minister waved a photograph of a submarine and claimed the Vanguard was in the South Atlantic.
I despair.
What an absolute joke.OMG! The Brits are invading continental Argentina!
'UK wants to see if we are tempted to take arms,' Puricelli - BuenosAiresHerald.com
He obviously stopped the rose pills. :lol2
Highly debatable at the very most.“We put up with that in Malvinas. But if they reach our continental territory we will exercise our exercise our legitimate right of defence and we have resources and skills to do so,” he warned.
you know, whatever differences we have here, most people made polite posts in the thread.This whole arguement that the Argies will take this to the UN is rediculous....
That nutered, toothless dog called the UN is wholely unable to deal with even legitimate issues...and reality is...NO 1st world country is going to give the Argie argument any credance at all.....Canada, the USA, Germany, France, Spain etc, etc, etc will very quickly realize that Argentina is wasting their time...they have NO legitimate claim to the islands...they can make up what ever retarded names for them they want...they are the FALKLAND Islands...they people their are BRITISH by decent and by choice....
If Argentina wants to really TRY and start issues.......well NATO bonds are tighter now than ever before.....the Argies may quickly find themselves sitting in an economic black hole...AGAIN...wondering what went wrong....they may end up with sanctions AGAINST them..then again.....the Argies really don;t have anything except canned corned beef anyway.........
It really reminds me of the " four eyed, glasses wearing, pocket protector using nerd" in grade school that gets "his dander" up and threatens to sue everyone and "charge" those that he sees as threats ( which is almost everyone as he is a weak, underfed, nerdy geek).....
Argentina may think that they are some kind of "Power house nation" in South America...BUT in reality they are a weak, overstuffed and egotistical 2nd rate country.....hell almost any country could militarily defeat the Argies......
No worries, no credible threat....just move along, nothing to see but the agonized throws of a dying "country"........
The Argies are much more adept at running "kidnapping" scams and petty crime IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY than being a world player.......
I won't cry at all for you Argentina...your bringing it on yourselves.......
The view from someone in a country NOT involved at all..............Not Brit and NOT Argie...........but a view being shared around the globe....
Why the thing about NATO and the US intervention over and over when the chance of war are zero?Nope , your wrong,
I have NO hatred.......BUT your Argie Government IS rattling sabres about something that Argentina has NO legal or historical right to...The Falklands Islands...
The countries in South America that have sided with Argentina are simply trading partners.....Brazil is totally corrupt and wouldn't / couldn;t effect any form of actual support....Paraguay and Uraguay don;t have anything to gain...but their misguided stance to stay in a good trading standing with Argenitna could land them in a situation that they may have serious issues with...economically.....
The WORLD is on edge enough with serious threats from genuine INSANE nations and their wing nut leaders like Iran and N. Korea...do we seriously need some two bit "Queen" of Argentina trying to ruffle feathers and start another issue?.......
Got news for you all...PROXIMITY to a country DOES NOT give it right to try and take it......look at Canada.we actually have French owned Islands right IN Canadian waters...do WE take them by force or try to force sanctions and bans on them?....Nope.......Do we take it to the UN?....nope.......so what gives Argentina the right to do or say anything?........NOTHING......
If I've offended your hotblooded latin sensabilities..then GOOD...why?...because it is apparent in recent history that the Argentinian Government is Incapable of running the country....and ran it to an almost unrecoverable level of anarchy. So IF most Argentinains DON;T support the Government and what is happening then perhaps YOU;d better wake up your countrymen...cause the path that YOUR being led down is a dangerous one..better oust your "queen" and her cronies and put a sensible leader in place...fast!
The Argentinain politicians...the self titled "Queen" and the retard that is serving as the Minister of Defense are spouting utter rubbish to the world's press...their retoric is borderline calling for an outright war.....therefore THEY are instigating a situation.
Bottom line is this....IF the Argentinians think that this time the US, Canada and any host of other nations will sit back and watch...they are liable to find themselves very suprised.......This time around...I'd bet apples to oranges there WILL be a US task force and other NATO forces involved.....do you really think that Brazil or any other south american nations will stand by Argentina when the odds stack that high against them?.......hell no.......
Now I certainly DON:T want to see any Argentinian people hurt...I don;t harbour any ill will or hatred towards them........BUT wake up and fix your Queen and cronies before your all going to war again......for a fairey tale........
Like I said......no ill will....no hatred........and I wish you all the best in the world.......but sorry........this time..I think the mood in the world and actual issues will play a big dividend and this Argentinian sobstory will be looked at what it is..a fairey tale fiction....
Good luck to you...stay safe and I hope the best for ya.......seriously.......it;s politics......and not personal.....
Yep..And of course Britain really would take a highly valuable strategic asset holding a high percentage of our nuclear deterrent and send it away from the well defended bastion areas it usually patrols in, into an area with little friendly support.
There's "Jumping the Shark" and then there's this.