No. It was developed in the 60's around the same time as the TSR.2 (which was the RAAFs preferred strike bomber option at the time)PJ-10 BrahMos said:Am i right to asume the "F-111" was under development during the same time as the B-2
No. Cruise missiles were not part of it's weaps loadout. Mainly freefalls, LGB's etc...P.A.F said:no. it also was nuke capable but it mainly fired cruise missiles.
Yep, if it wasn't for the lessons learnt from the F-111, we never would have seen the F-14 and quite possibly the Russians would not have developed the flipper Migs as well (which were attempts to copy the swing wing concepts embodied in the F-111)PJ-10 BrahMos said:But still the development of the F-111 fighter bomber during the 60s/70s did sound Adventurous for that time i suppose ??
Umair is correct. The A-12 was going to be the interceptor version of the SR-71. It had long range strike and air intercept missiles (no guns).umair said:Wrong on that one too PAF.The SR-71 had no role as a bomber/missile carrier.There was however a version(A-12? Gary :help ) which came before the dedicated recon type, configured for a strategic bomber intercept role.(These were later converted to the recon version)
Hmmm.unknown_3x said:hey guys we don need to discous the weapons in other hands we have to make weapons for our own hand ....so we must make something which is not come first in american or jew or brit mind first .....ok tell me do you ppl think americas f22 raptor or lightning a(lock head make) can be shot down with JF-17 (pak/china) ...naah i don think so coz biggest thret is not india its a jew and american loby for us