Canada prepares tank unit for Afghanistan

Gladius

New Member
Aussie Digger said:
Canada to my knowledge, is the first Country to announce a deployment of a tracker armoured fighting vehicle to Afghanistan.
If I recall correctly, that's wrong. About IFV/APCs obviously.

The US Army deployed the M-113 in Afghanistan years ago (Anaconda Op.), I don't know if any remain there now. Also, some BV-206S are being deployed on Afghanistan by Italy, Canada, and the US Army (some time ago).

However, Canada will be the only (and first, IIRC) country with tanks deployed to suport their troops in Aghanistan, at this moment.
 
Last edited:

scraw

New Member
Gladius said:
The US Army deployed the M-113 in Afghanistan years ago (Anaconda Op.)
Are you sure about that one? Reading 'Not a Good Day to Die' I don't recall any mention of M113s, nor during 18 Hours (by an Australian SAS guy that was there).
 

icelord

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
To my knowledge, i'm gettign 18hrs next weeks, but wasn't anaconda chinooks deploying marines into a retarded, defenceless position, with Aus SAS calling air support from the near by mountain, with no APCs involved, mainly air resources.
 

Gladius

New Member
scraw said:
Are you sure about that one? Reading 'Not a Good Day to Die' I don't recall any mention of M113s, nor during 18 Hours (by an Australian SAS guy that was there).
They were mentioned in many Spanish newspapers articles, quoting AP reports. But you know the journalists, and their "exact" and "always trustworthy" informations.

Still conserve some of those articles in my Hard Disc. They are of different media, from there my credit to the information. But reading them with greater care, they all quote as source "informations" of AP (Associated Press). Unfortunately, they don't refer literally those news notes of AP. Therefore I haven't be able to verify if the information is all correct or not. Or if there is a confusion (in the AP notes or in the Spanish Newspapers interpretation of those) over the canadian BV-206S of the detachment comanded by the Lt. Col. Pat Stogran. Unfortunately that type of errors is very common in the spanish media.

Thats the source of my mention of M-113.

In the other hand "icelord", during Anaconda the BV-206S (an APC) were in fact deployed by Chinooks near the Shah-I-Kot Valley to evacuation and resupply purposes. In reserve positions it's true, but they were included in the operation.
 
Last edited:

icelord

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
In the other hand "icelord", during Anaconda the BV-206S (an APC) were in fact deployed by Chinooks near the Shah-I-Kot Valley to evacuation and resupply purposes. In reserve positions it's true, but they were included in the operation.
Ahh ok, but no APC attack per say.
 

scraw

New Member
icelord said:
To my knowledge, i'm gettign 18hrs next weeks, but wasn't anaconda chinooks deploying marines into a retarded, defenceless position, with Aus SAS calling air support from the near by mountain, with no APCs involved, mainly air resources.
Not just US Marines, there was all sorts running about the place.

To be honest where they were put was less of an issue than who was picked for the job, poor appreciation of what they were getting into and completely ferked (or completely lacking) communications between commands.

But anyway, we're running well off topic.
 
Last edited:
Top