Takao
The Bunker Group
Can't be too harsh; it's one of the few (even at Russell) with a Federation Star....What's with the cammed up delivery van parked between the two armored vehicles?
Can't be too harsh; it's one of the few (even at Russell) with a Federation Star....What's with the cammed up delivery van parked between the two armored vehicles?
Defence have a video to go with the above:"(l-r) Hanwha Defence Australia REDBACK Infantry Fighting Vehicle, Australian Army Armoured Personnel Carrier M1123 AS4, and Rheinmetall Defence Australia LYNX KF41 Infantry Fighting Vehicle at Russell Offices, Canberra." (Image source ADF image library link)
Me too. Well above my pay grade. Mind you if some navy rum and Speights beers ...Does not appear to be a whole lot of difference between them, does there? I am glad I am not responsible for the decision.
They are replacing 431 M-113AS4 so yes numbers are pretty spot on. The M-113 come in 7 different variants including APC, Armoured Fitters, Armoured Recovery, Armoured Ambulance, Armoured Mortar, Armoured Command, Armoured Logistics. So we can pretty much expect the same. There is plans for a true SP Mortar fitted with a turreted 120mm Mortar, there has been talk of a Amphibious version but I’m not sure if that is still being planned.A couple of questions on Land 400 Phase 3 since that's the current topic:
I think the decision will be made next year with IOC (I assume that would be one mechanised battalion?) is in about 2025? Then all delivered by 2031? Or is that all a little optimistic?
On the actual numbers. So we're looking at three battalions fielding the IFV, right? "Rifle" companies will need 14 each, then maybe what another 28 per battalion? That would only be 210. Yeah we need more for spares and training, but isn't 450 a bit high?
I wouldn't agree that numbers are spot on based on how many M113s we bought. I mean, there's no plan for the new IFVs to be given to reserve units is there? And even if we look at the M113 numbers, we discover that fewer than that number were upgraded (and what a waste that exercise was, IMHO). Yeah, on a superficial level, it's a replacement for the M113, so you can say about the same number sounds right. But I just don't think that should be the case if we're only outfitting three battalions? Numbers will likely change though, like you say. But then the Boxer numbers haven't changed too much. They make sense to me too. They'll be in use with three armoured cavalry regiments, each with two cavalry squadrons. So, maybe, 40-50 Boxers per regiment? That'd be between a little more than half and up to about 75% of the inventory. Yet three battalions of the IFVs might account for fewer than half of 450. I wonder if the original number is somewhat of an ambit claim? My guess is we'll be lucky to see 350. Or am I completely wrong?They are replacing 431 M-113AS4 so yes numbers are pretty spot on. The M-113 come in 7 different variants including APC, Armoured Fitters, Armoured Recovery, Armoured Ambulance, Armoured Mortar, Armoured Command, Armoured Logistics. So we can pretty much expect the same. There is plans for a true SP Mortar fitted with a turreted 120mm Mortar, there has been talk of a Amphibious version but I’m not sure if that is still being planned.
The 2020 Defence update has Land 400 phase 3 going on past 2035 but I’m not sure about IOC, though 2025 sounds a bit optimistic.
We won’t know the actual numbers being ordered until the winner is announced, with phase 2 the number being talked about was always up to 225 but in the end only 211 Boxers have been ordered at this stage.
Thank you for sharing. Ties with the Force Structure Plan from a few months back. Would like to see more detail in how this will be implemented.View attachment 48094
Massive reorg for the reserves. Losing brigade titles and potentially battalions by the looks of it.
Screen shot taken from Aus and NZ Defender who have taken a doom and gloom approach.
He is a crank of the highest order that guy, blames ADF ”headsheds” for the demise of his magazine given the changes in media policy over the years, makes up his own designations and names for things out of his own head and constantly gets details wrong.View attachment 48094
Massive reorg for the reserves. Losing brigade titles and potentially battalions by the looks of it.
Screen shot taken from Aus and NZ Defender who have taken a doom and gloom approach.
Another Goon squad member?He is a crank of the highest order that guy, blames ADF ”headsheds” for the demise of his magazine given the changes in media policy over the years, makes up his own designations and names for things out of his own head and constantly gets details wrong.
His opinion of things, is one to take with more than the usual caution, IMHO.
Not exactly of that sort. Think more a defence related Pauline Hanson, with a grudge against ADF HQ.Another Goon squad member?
First post, so be kind. The idea of changing up the reserves in this way makes sense - there's a lot of wasted capability in units that in some cases exist to keep a historical title running.View attachment 48094
Massive reorg for the reserves. Losing brigade titles and potentially battalions by the looks of it.
Screen shot taken from Aus and NZ Defender who have taken a doom and gloom approach.
Very rarely are his articles positive especially when it comes to Subs, Tiger and F-35.He is a crank of the highest order that guy, blames ADF ”headsheds” for the demise of his magazine given the changes in media policy over the years, makes up his own designations and names for things out of his own head and constantly gets details wrong.
His opinion of things, is one to take with more than the usual caution, IMHO.
Yep, that’s his other issue. He certainly doesn’t want feedback on some of the more ‘exotic’ things he comes up with...Very rarely are his articles positive especially when it comes to Subs, Tiger and F-35.
We should only but US gear in his opinion. My subscription won't be renewed after seeing what's actually written. It's a shame we can't post comments on the articles written.