You'll find "35+ km" in all declassified official data sources, including MBDA's own datasheet advertising it. The 55 km given in some sources are an unofficial estimation, and a rather low one at that.55 km range
You'll find "35+ km" in all declassified official data sources, including MBDA's own datasheet advertising it. The 55 km given in some sources are an unofficial estimation, and a rather low one at that.55 km range
So, that beats SS-n-14, I suppose....You'll find "35+ km" in all declassified official data sources, including MBDA's own datasheet advertising it. The 55 km given in some sources are an unofficial estimation, and a rather low one at that.
Range isn’t that phenomenal?And just what it sounds like - i.e. an unguided rocket that only brings its payload into the rough desired target area. Range isn't that phenomenal either.
The Soviet Union developed a number of guided missiles carrying torpedoes, e.g. URPK-4/-5 (Metel/SS-N-14 Silex, for ships) and RPK-2 (Viyuga/SS-N-15 Starfish, for submarines). - kato
SS-N-14 Silex is an ASW missile with a range of some 50 km constituting the main armament of the Udaloy class destroyers among others.SS-N-14 is the only one with decent performance against surface ships since it can be used as a regular anti-ship missile, and carries a 185-kg HEAT warhead for this purpose in addition to the lightweight torpedo (with a 60-kg warhead) that it carries for ASW. With some 50 km range it's also the longest-ranged such system. – kato
Gotta think torpedo terms - mostly in a defensive sense. A ship launching at under 50 nm distance is within the weapons envelope of the attacked submarine. The opposite of that is what stand-off weapon implies.Well if you think in cruise missiles’ terms, then it’s not.
The idea was to have a more effective long range anti ship weapon then using multiple missiles to engage a ship. As anti missile defences are so advanced on ships and torpedo's are so effective against ships, I was thinking of incorporating best of the two weapon systems.i don't see the advantage that a long range ASW missile can offer to a surface ship. All ASW ships today carry at least one ASW helicopter, and during ASW picket duty will have a ASW aircraft in attendance. ASW torpedo is only useful if the sub are detected too close and there's little time to launch a helo,so the extra fuel
is a waste. For long range engagement, a helo is better.
The main problem with a long range ASW weapon is having a good enough target position for you to engage at that range. The Helo is a good platfrom because it can localise as well as drop the weapon. The weapon may have a homing capability, but it still has limitsThe idea was to have a more effective long range anti ship weapon then using multiple missiles to engage a ship. As anti missile defences are so advanced on ships and torpedo's are so effective against ships, I was thinking of incorporating best of the two weapon systems.
A cruise missile style UAV could be launched to carry the torpedo to its target range and then provide the weapon with accurate guidance? Or perhaps the weapon could be controlled wirelessly, using radar from the surface vessel or from any other survalance source in the military's arsenal to guide it or the weapons operator. Anyway I'm sure with the rate of advancing technology we're either going to progress past the need for anything other than missiles or continue finding new weapons, followed by finding new countermeasures etc.The main problem with a long range ASW weapon is having a good enough target position for you to engage at that range. The Helo is a good platfrom because it can localise as well as drop the weapon. The weapon may have a homing capability, but it still has limits
Unless of course you intend to use a nuclear warhead.
SM-2 block III missile can engage an incoming missile from more then 100km away. To overcome this, the missile must release the torpedo outside the effective range of the enemy air defence system. All ASW missile today carry a payload of a lightweight ASW torpedo which barely sufficient to penetrate a hull of it's primary target, a submarine, let alone to cause considerable damage to the large surface ship. Plus, the torpedo short range mean's the missile must enter the enemy air defence coverage to reach a release point. there's a chance that the missile will be shot down before it can release. For a long range heavy torpedo, there's no practical way for a normal size missile to carry one. let's look it this way. a Mk-48 heavy torpedo weight 3400 pound. A tomahawk missile weight 2900 pound. I can't imagine how big the missile that can haul a heavy torpedo. It may not even be able to fit into a hull of most warships today.The idea was to have a more effective long range anti ship weapon then using multiple missiles to engage a ship. As anti missile defences are so advanced on ships and torpedo's are so effective against ships, I was thinking of incorporating best of the two weapon systems.
Where does the cruise missile get the target information?A cruise missile style UAV could be launched to carry the torpedo to its target range and then provide the weapon with accurate guidance? Or perhaps the weapon could be controlled wirelessly, using radar from the surface vessel or from any other survalance source in the military's arsenal to guide it or the weapons operator. Anyway I'm sure with the rate of advancing technology we're either going to progress past the need for anything other than missiles or continue finding new weapons, followed by finding new countermeasures etc.