DefConGuru
New Member
Assumption is the MOAFU over and out.Is that meant to mean anything?
I note that you haven't answered the questions. I must assume that's because you don't know the answers to the second one.
Assumption is the MOAFU over and out.Is that meant to mean anything?
I note that you haven't answered the questions. I must assume that's because you don't know the answers to the second one.
In my experience, cryptic comments such as your last two are almost invariably a cover for ignorance, & tend to confirm the impression given your post which first led me to ask you questions (which I'm still waiting for answers to). I'm trying to find out what basis you have for what you've said, & what you are replying with is on the level of "Naah, naah, not going to tell you". Very mature.Assumption is the MOAFU over and out.
If cryptics was your major please go back to your school and ask for a refund. You haven't asked me anything. Maybe I'm replying with "naah naah not going to tell you" because I don't know what in the name of f*** you are talking about!In my experience, cryptic comments such as your last two are almost invariably a cover for ignorance, & tend to confirm the impression given your post which first led me to ask you questions (which I'm still waiting for answers to). I'm trying to find out what basis you have for what you've said, & what you are replying with is on the level of "Naah, naah, not going to tell you". Very mature.
BTW, this forum actively discourages posts such as your last two. I suggest reading the rules, in particular rule 2. Posts should be meaningful.
http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.php
It is quite obvious you have me confused with someone else. You never asked me anything. Open your eyes, scroll up, and READ.Is that meant to mean anything?
I note that you haven't answered the questions. I must assume that's because you don't know the answers to the second one.
True - I carelessly took your reply to my question to Stryker001 as from him. My apologies for that. But why did you reply to two of my posts with rather enigmatic one-liners? I refer you - again - to Rule 2. http://defencetalk.com/forums/rules.phpIt is quite obvious you have me confused with someone else. You never asked me anything. Open your eyes, scroll up, and READ.
This winter in Afghanistan is going to be very "hot" according to these articles:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/03/AR2008090302005.html
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/world/bal-afghan0905,0,7318056.story
The US is preparing a major winter offensive to deny the insurgents (Taliban) a stay in Afghanistan during the winter months. The major surge in attacks this year by the Taliban is linked to a growing number of Taliban who stay in the country during winter and don`t have to cross the border from their staging areas in Pakistan.
My question is despite use of full fire power and NATO support ,why few thausand talaban are out of control of super power ,which can attack on three countries having army equivalent to russia at a time.Shirke thanks for that I agree it's time to make them react to us, not US react to them. We need to keep them off balance, the trouble was we had and still have not nearly enough troops in country.