A New War Ahead

Status
Not open for further replies.

eckherl

The Bunker Group
Verified Defense Pro
Also in ur dream to see US and Russian work together, especially when come to "Missile Sheild Programme" located in Poland (Missile Launcher System) and Czech Republic (Radar & EWC System).
Who stated anything inregards to the missile shield differences between Russia and the U.S, we are talking cooperation inregards to the war on terror, joint intel shared between Russia and the U.S is of great benefit to both countries to disrupt terrorist networking and attacks.

Also if I may add that Russia may of not had a terror attack at the same magnitude as of 911 the smaller ones like the school and theater attacks were horrible for the Russian people and to the people worldwide, you can bet most certain that Russia will do whatever it takes to ensure that another one will not occur on Russian soil and interests abroad, including working with the U.S or anyone else for that matter, the stakes are way to high.
 

Teindva

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #22
The topic is getting somewhat out of track but a thing of importance is to be discussed here. One thing is that Pakistan is considered to be the only Muslim country with a questionable army and able to become a hurdle in the way of interests of any traditional claiming super power. In Russia there is the land of Chechniya and Tartaristan on the course of claiming independence. Similarly, China has the land of eastern Turkistan almost double the size of Pakistan and China being alarmed of the Uighur Turks to rise against its usurpers tries best to assisst Pakistan in every field. Similarly U.S is struck by the terror of terrorists and all these may make a front against Muslims and the only Muslim nuclear power in the vacinity. But Russia seems less alarmed and cautious than China and U.S. and might not include in a league against Pakistan. Mr.Putin might make some deal with the Tatar and Chechen Muslims and could avenge its defeat in Afghanistan by aiding groups fighting against Americans but Putin is not man of the strength of his predecessors. One thing is there, unlike Americans Russians are good in keeping word.
 

Twister

New Member
Putin is the best Russian President. He successfully put the Russian on track again after break up of Soviet Union.

He will doing the best together with President Hu of PRC to ensure their ally and netural country especially at their nation border not affected of NATO influence.

In this case, the only problem is Pakistan since India and most of South Asia has good relation with Russian but hopefully President Hu can lend his hand.
 

Preceptor

Super Moderator
Staff member
Where is the thread going? The title suggests "A New War Ahead," but there is no mention of whom the combatants will be, or what/why they will be fighting.

The discussion seems to revolve around the formation of South Asian-based defence alliance. Ignoring the various relationships between the various South Asian nations, what is the raison d'etre for the defensive alliance?

Currently, most commentary seems to concentrate on geo-politics, not defence matters. Please get the thread back onto appropriate topics (i.e. no politics) or it will be closed.
-Preceptor
 

Teindva

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #25
Mr.Preceptor! As you have mentioned revolving is a best military tactic so do not get bored of the discussion. There are hidden soldiers in it, in the glacier suffering, in Vahgah border stamping and jumping just like a mad dance, foreigners intruding the land from all sides, all factions of Farangees are being collected to further make a pressure to stay there, to tackle with the Farangees guerillas of almost every nationality of the world are also enmassing to make the land a grand battlefield, further is tried to make the battlefield widened to the inner central region. Isn't this enough as a military subject of a grand strategy. All that is needed is to revolve and resolve.
 

Twister

New Member
The best way to win against NATO troop in Afghanistan was by hit & run tactics.

Most NATO citizen has question the logics of sending troop to Afghanistan which cost money & life of their soldier. Most casuallities throu ambuse or by IED will put more cautions from citizen and then put pressure on their leader. This tactics seem to be success against Australian Army in Iraq.

Direct engagement will not a good solution. NATO has a best equipment and well trained personel.
 

hellfire

Member
The best way to win against NATO troop in Afghanistan was by hit & run tactics.

Most NATO citizen has question the logics of sending troop to Afghanistan which cost money & life of their soldier. Most casuallities throu ambuse or by IED will put more cautions from citizen and then put pressure on their leader. This tactics seem to be success against Australian Army in Iraq.

Direct engagement will not a good solution. NATO has a best equipment and well trained personel.
well only people who proabaly hate NATO will start a thread like this ,i guess u are one of those people with islamic idealogy.why dont us ask urself why are NATO and US in afghanistan,who made them or who provoked them to go to afghanistan .

well why dont u start a thread on how u to combat terrorism for eg in ur own country,if a country leaders know that there are terrorists operating in their soil they should act against them,otherwise somebody is going to go after the bad guys(terrorists)which is why we US sending in the UCAV strikes in pak.
 

Teindva

New Member
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #28
Fighters in Afghanistan are the same people who were heroes when they were fighting against communism, they were once made sit beside Mr.Reagon in his parliament who did stand up to make them sit first. At that time these heroes were having even their packed fast food from the United States which they used to just heat and eat. Now the same people have been started hunted for as the United State feared them becoming the formidable opponants to impose the New World Order on the world. Mr.Bush could not become Solomon of the world and could not form an Eastern American Empire or Bushuntium capturing Iraq, Iran Syria and Turkey.
Study about the plan of the New World Order and these heroes who are labelled as terrorists. Europe has been dragged into this war who have not been a part of it by their own. Just think that are you the only nation in the world to name people heroes or terrorists when or whom you like. Remain in peace and try not to master the world.
 

Preceptor

Super Moderator
Staff member
I see my concerns about the what and why of this thread were justified. This is a DEFENCE forum, not a geo-political forum for discussion of or conspiracy theories about the "New World Order". Thread locked.
-Preceptor
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top