Thursday, July 3, 2025
  • About us
    • Write for us
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms of use
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS Feeds
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us
DefenceTalk
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports
No Result
View All Result
DefenceTalk
No Result
View All Result
Home Defence & Military News Missile News

Second Taepodong Launch Not Imminent Say US Officials

by Editor
July 7, 2006
in Missile News
2 min read
0
14
VIEWS

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE,

Washington: North Korea does not appear to be preparing a second long-range Taepodong-2 missile for launch, but it could fire more shorter-range missiles to stay at the center of world attention, US officials said Thursday.

NBC News reported late Wednesday, citing unidentified US intelligence officials, that a second Taeopodong-2 missile was in “the final stages of assembly.”

Officials did not discount the report, and one noted that there were other reports from the region pointing to a second North Korean long-range missile.

But other US officials said there were no indications that a Taepodong-2 launch was imminent.

“Just look at the process. You have to get it out there, you have to get it up, you have to match it, you've got to fuel it. We're looking at a minimum of days, if not weeks,” said a US defense official.

“There's no indications of preparations of a second launch,” he said.

A third US official said North Korea may make good on threats to continue the missile tests by launching shorter-range Nodong or Scud-C missiles, but not the longer-range Taepodong-2 so soon after a test failure.

“You've got to take into consideration that they had a catastrophic failure of their last launch, and does it make sense to roll another out and pop it off,” the official said.

“They need to calculate that if there's a problem we experienced for the last one, could there be a problem for another one?” he said.

“Chances are they may pop off another of these small ones to keep themselves at the center of attention,” the official said.

“It doesn't seem likely in the near term that they would touch off another of these big ones either until they figure out what went wrong, or two, it's just the nature of the vehicle itself that it takes time to get it up,” he said.

North Korea ended a self-imposed moratorium on long-range missile tests on Tuesday by launching a Taepodong-2 along with six shorter-range Nodong and Scud-type missiles.

It had last tested a long-range missile in 1998, when it stunned the world by firing a Taepodong-1 over Japan and into the Pacific.

US officials said the three-stage Taepodong-2, which was estimated to be capable of hitting parts of the United States, failed after 42 seconds in flight.

The cause “could have been engine or control problem failures,” the US defense official said.

The United States has said the missile failed after about 40 seconds in flight.

But a senior South Korean intelligence official in Seoul said Thursday the missile was in the air for seven minutes, including 42 seconds of normal flight, before landing in the Sea of Japan.

The US defense official said the missile continued to burn after it failed and was in the air “upwards of two minutes.”

A spokesman for the US Northern Command said it was premature to give an exact timeline of the Taepodong launch.

“What we're saying is that it failed less than a minute into its flight,” said Mike Kucharek, the command spokesman. “It's entirely possible it failed in its trajectory but continued to burn in its descent.”

But Kucharek said the South Koreans may have confused the Taepodong-2 with a shorter-range missile that flew for a longer time.

Previous Post

Development of Shaftless Propulsion for Subs

Next Post

Boeing to Build Three Additional Global Positioning System Satellites

Related Posts

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

May 17, 2025

Britain and Germany are working together to develop strike missiles, their defence ministers said Thursday, as Russia's war rages in...

North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires flurry of short-range ballistic missiles

May 9, 2025

North Korea fired multiple types of short-range ballistic missiles Thursday, South Korea's military said, around a week after leader Kim...

Next Post

Boeing to Build Three Additional Global Positioning System Satellites

Latest Defense News

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

Britain, Germany jointly developing missiles: ministers

May 17, 2025
Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

Trump announces ‘full and immediate’ India-Pakistan ceasefire

May 10, 2025
Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

Pakistan says Indian missiles strike air bases as conflict spirals

May 10, 2025
J-10C fighter jet

Pakistan says India has brought neighbours ‘closer to major conflict’

May 9, 2025
North Korea fires multiple suspected cruise missiles

North Korea fires flurry of short-range ballistic missiles

May 9, 2025
China says ‘closely watching’ Ukraine situation after Russian attack

China vows to stand with Russia in face of ‘hegemonic bullying’

May 9, 2025

Defense Forum Discussions

  • Middle East Defence & Security
  • European Union, member states and Agencies
  • Australian Army Discussions and Updates
  • Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
  • Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) News and Discussions
  • Indonesia: 'green water navy'
  • ADF General discussion thread
  • Indonesian Aero News
  • The Russian-Ukrainian War Thread
  • Royal Australian Air Force [RAAF] News, Discussions and Updates
DefenceTalk

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com

Navigate Site

  • Defence Forum
  • Military Photos
  • RSS Feeds
  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Contact us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Defense News
    • Defense & Geopolitics News
    • War Conflicts News
    • Army News
    • Air Force News
    • Navy News
    • Missiles Systems News
    • Nuclear Weapons
    • Defense Technology
    • Cybersecurity News
  • Military Photos
  • Defense Forum
  • Military Videos
  • Military Weapon Systems
    • Weapon Systems
    • Reports

© 2003-2020 DefenceTalk.com