Latest activity
-
TFuel loading at Mochovce 4 reactor has been completed and start-up can now begin. The reactor is expected to begin commercial operation...
-
John Fedup replied to the thread Future Energy Pathways.Some news on smaller nuclear power output in the attached link. DARPA's Rads to Watts program could offer small power cells that could... -
SStampede reacted to StevoJH's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
2043 for HMAS Perth seems extremely ambitious. HMAS ANZAC lasted 28 years, HMAS Perth would be 37 years old in 2043. -
SStampede reacted to Richo99's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Instead of tranches of 3+4+4, I can see it changing to 5+3+3. 2 extra ships quickly from a hot Japanese line, more time for WA to set...
-
VVolkodav replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.I believe it was because both Australia and Indonesia signed the nuclear non poliferation treaty. Basically we both decided to spend on...
-
Kkoxinga replied to the thread Indonesia: 'green water navy'.The Scorpene Evolved steel cutting is shifted to 7 August.
-
VVolkodav reacted to spoz's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
It seems likely to me that is largely around defusing issues in his own party. There was apparently quite a lot of noise around AUKUS...
-
VVolkodav reacted to south's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Any chance we could stick to the forum rules? E.G. knock off the BRS noise, the one liners, and the unsupported (ie no links/evidence)...
-
VVolkodav replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Thought about it and reconsidered, Souths right, this is the wrong thread.
-
Jezza reacted to Richo99's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Instead of tranches of 3+4+4, I can see it changing to 5+3+3. 2 extra ships quickly from a hot Japanese line, more time for WA to set... -
Oold faithful reacted to StevoJH's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
2043 for HMAS Perth seems extremely ambitious. HMAS ANZAC lasted 28 years, HMAS Perth would be 37 years old in 2043.
-
SStevoJH replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.2043 for HMAS Perth seems extremely ambitious. HMAS ANZAC lasted 28 years, HMAS Perth would be 37 years old in 2043.
-
RRicho99 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Instead of tranches of 3+4+4, I can see it changing to 5+3+3. 2 extra ships quickly from a hot Japanese line, more time for WA to set...
-
RRicho99 reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Don’t want to be too negative but big projects over many years do tend to change with time. A look at all the navy builds over the last...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.StingrayOZ I don’t want to discount the urgency or the importance of the Mogami build. A prudent choice, but still a challenge to get...