Latest activity
-
Jezza reacted to Richo99's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
Instead of tranches of 3+4+4, I can see it changing to 5+3+3. 2 extra ships quickly from a hot Japanese line, more time for WA to set... -
Oold faithful reacted to StevoJH's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
2043 for HMAS Perth seems extremely ambitious. HMAS ANZAC lasted 28 years, HMAS Perth would be 37 years old in 2043.
-
SStevoJH replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.2043 for HMAS Perth seems extremely ambitious. HMAS ANZAC lasted 28 years, HMAS Perth would be 37 years old in 2043.
-
RRicho99 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Instead of tranches of 3+4+4, I can see it changing to 5+3+3. 2 extra ships quickly from a hot Japanese line, more time for WA to set...
-
RRicho99 reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Don’t want to be too negative but big projects over many years do tend to change with time. A look at all the navy builds over the last...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.StingrayOZ I don’t want to discount the urgency or the importance of the Mogami build. A prudent choice, but still a challenge to get...
-
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Origionally, it was planned to have all 11 built by 2040 if remember correctly. I can't see how Henderson yard could build 8 Frigates...
-
StingrayOZ replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Yes, but there should be a sense of urgency. This isn't a regular acquisition program happening according to decades of planning, and we... -
StingrayOZ reacted to ADMk2's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Contracts are only just starting for the initial build in Japan. These things take time in defence land…...
-
Oold faithful reacted to Stampede's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Don’t want to be too negative but big projects over many years do tend to change with time. A look at all the navy builds over the last...
-
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Don’t want to be too negative but big projects over many years do tend to change with time. A look at all the navy builds over the last...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Contracts are only just starting for the initial build in Japan. These things take time in defence land…...
-
StingrayOZ replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.If there was a capacity short fall.. Oh no, we buy more Japanese Mogami's and push the initial Mogami build back. This may also allow...
-
Oold faithful replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.More " MADE IN JAPAN" ships you think?
-
recce.k1 replied to the thread NZDF General discussion thread.The RFI has been issued - RFI: Persistent Surveillance (Air) Phase 1. I guess the thinking behind a (4 year) commercial contract is to...