Menu
Home
Defence News
Military Photos
New media
New comments
Defence Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Latest activity
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Ananda
replied to the thread
General Naval News
.
https://www.facebook.com/share/1D74AJTsdL/ A Thai Journalist FB shown report on Hyundai taking some Thai Jornalists to their facility...
Saturday at 6:45 PM
Ananda
replied to the thread
Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update
.
This situation can't be simply call force majeure. That'd more to the situation beyond their control, like war, natural disaster or...
Saturday at 11:18 AM
S
swerve
replied to the thread
Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update
.
There's a legal principle called force majeure. A company is not, in general, legally liable for something which is beyond its control...
Saturday at 10:43 AM
Ananda
replied to the thread
Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update
.
https://www.dawn.com/news/2000367 As predicted, Malaysia blown up the NSM export license as part of preparation to get legal...
Saturday at 6:56 AM
S
Stampede
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
The p5 looks interesting Await some more info and visuals. Cheers S
Saturday at 3:51 AM
S
StevoJH
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
They aren’t real small. The P5 will take up about 8 square metres of space and is stored fully assembled. You could probably use some...
Saturday at 3:34 AM
K
koxinga
replied to the thread
Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update
.
The issue is apparently due to the inclusion of US ITAR restricted components in the latest versions
Saturday at 12:45 AM
spoz
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
The Strix is quite a big platform; probably store one (maybe 2) in the mission bay of an HCF, a fair number in an LHD and maybe one on...
Saturday at 12:25 AM
AndyinOz
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
From what I gather and could source Strix is a whole different class of VTOL 160kg payload at 800km range for the purpose we seem to...
Friday at 8:28 PM
recce.k1
reacted to
Xthenaki's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
On the Royal Navy forum a member suggested the possibility of using a "Lite" T31 to fill the Royal Navies replacements for Batch 1 and...
Friday at 6:52 PM
S
swerve
replied to the thread
European Union, member states and Agencies
.
As if the Taliban can be trusted on that!
Friday at 5:59 PM
S
swerve
replied to the thread
Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) update
.
It's not Kongsberg's fault if the Norwegian government changes the rules on export licences. Obviously, the new rules are going to...
Friday at 5:23 PM
S
swerve
replied to the thread
The Royal Navy Discussions and Updates
.
A Type 31 built to the minimal spec defined some years ago, without Mk 41 & only launchers for a dozen CAMM, is close to a 'lite'...
Friday at 5:02 PM
R
Rob c
reacted to
Nighthawk.NZ's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
That whole post has kinda slipped totally away from this thread being RNZN and into politics
Friday at 4:00 PM
Cadredave
reacted to
Pepe le pew's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
It might be a good idea as it is totally off topic...
Friday at 3:05 PM
Home
What's new
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top