Menu
Home
Defence News
Military Photos
New media
New comments
Defence Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Latest activity
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
S
StevoJH
replied to the thread
US Navy News and updates
.
Sure a single SSGN variant of an SSBN will carry more missiles, but you can have more Virginia Block V's.
Wednesday at 8:32 AM
S
Stampede
reacted to
SamB's post
in the thread
AUKUS
with
Like
.
My understanding was that the SSN build rate was at 1.6 and they needed to up it above 2 to deliver on AUKAS. Graph is locked on 2.
Wednesday at 7:11 AM
S
Stampede
reacted to
Mark_Evans's post
in the thread
AUKUS
with
Like
.
I understood we would be getting one out of a mid life refurb before any new builds.
Wednesday at 7:11 AM
Mark_Evans
replied to the thread
AUKUS
.
I understood we would be getting one out of a mid life refurb before any new builds.
Wednesday at 6:45 AM
John Fedup
reacted to
StingrayOZ's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
Australia has a fair amount of high end capability, but in a conflict to our north, NZ is likely to be vulnerable to grey zone pressure...
Wednesday at 6:45 AM
John Fedup
replied to the thread
US Navy News and updates
.
Certainly the missile load of a SSN with the VPM is decent but is still less than the SSGN Ohio. The SSBN Ohio class were much more...
Wednesday at 6:38 AM
S
StobieWan
replied to the thread
US Navy News and updates
.
I.was thinking the SSGN would be a new build Colombia hull with a size and load out similar to the Ohios currently in service. If...
Wednesday at 6:35 AM
R
Richo99
replied to the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
.
If you keep drilling down with AI, it will tell you it has no primary sources, only secondary reports, many of which are contradictory...
Wednesday at 5:38 AM
CJohn
reacted to
Rob c's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
Totally agree, high end not required, but the ability to counter basic air threat as in long range transport or bombers and response to...
Wednesday at 5:11 AM
CJohn
reacted to
Rob c's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
There are several levels to be considered for this and the end result could go on for some time so breafly. We must also consider tha an...
Wednesday at 5:06 AM
S
Stampede
replied to the thread
AUKUS
.
Long timetables over many decades may or may not go to script. Looking at the end closest to 2026 and around a decade ahead , can we see...
Wednesday at 4:26 AM
recce.k1
reacted to
Rob c's post
in the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
with
Like
.
Totally agree, high end not required, but the ability to counter basic air threat as in long range transport or bombers and response to...
Wednesday at 3:58 AM
Ananda
replied to the thread
The Indonesian Army
.
Just put photo of the armored gun vehicle above should be already replace by armoured vehicle gun below. The order of 50 that being done...
Wednesday at 3:52 AM
R
Rob c
replied to the thread
Royal New Zealand Navy Discussions and Updates
.
Totally agree, high end not required, but the ability to counter basic air threat as in long range transport or bombers and response to...
Wednesday at 1:46 AM
O
old faithful
reacted to
iambuzzard's post
in the thread
Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0
with
Like
.
I was being a little tongue in cheek on the Phalanx but that load out makes it a very capable warship. How effective is the Bushmaster...
Wednesday at 1:24 AM
Home
What's new
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top