Latest activity
-
RRicho99 reacted to ADMk2's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
Sea-129 Ph.5 was cancelled in 2023 and seemingly nothing has moved on maritime T-UAS since that time? Certainly nothing “openly”… We... -
Ananda replied to the thread Indian Military Aviation; News, Updates & Discussions.https://militarnyi.com/en/news/india-to-order-31-additional-rafale-m-jets/... -
SStampede replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.In part it’s numbers. An RAN with no more than ten major warships till the Hunters and Mogami hit meaningful numbers in the mid to...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Sea-129 Ph.5 was cancelled in 2023 and seemingly nothing has moved on maritime T-UAS since that time? Certainly nothing “openly”… We...
-
AADMk2 reacted to Reptilia's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Around $30 billion for the new submarine yard seems outrageous, 10 times the size of Osborne South. Down payment of $3.9 billion +...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.I remember Navy “wanted” that capability so much, they left the selection of the vessel’s primary weapon and associated fire control...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.Self-defence capability is no longer a thing for a naval ship? I know RAN doesn’t “plan” to use these in a combat role. But...
-
Ananda replied to the thread Indonesian Aero News.https://tribune.com.pk/story/2592406/indonesia-seeks-to-leverage-pafs-training-ecosystem-and-aerospace-capabilities Seems officially...
-
spoz replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.You may remember that Navy also wanted them armed with a 40 mm. And, they still need ships for off shore constabulary tasks where a... -
Tasman reacted to spoz's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The OPV contract scope reduction was certainly not the Navy’s idea. That’s all down to the Government. None of the three Services do... -
Takao reacted to ADMk2's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The capability manager for OPV is who again? CASG earn their fair share of the blame no doubt about it. But it’s Navy who wanted a... -
AADMk2 reacted to Takao's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
SEA 1180 went through the courts for a bunch of stuff, and I can't find copies of findings to confirm how much is open source. But there...
-
AADMk2 replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.The capability manager for OPV is who again? CASG earn their fair share of the blame no doubt about it. But it’s Navy who wanted a...
-
Jezza reacted to SammyC's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Government commits multi-billion investment to build Adelaide submarine yard looks like there is a Government announcement today... -
TFrom Swiderek Maciejka FB on the 2nd Indonesia Rafale C F4 with registration # T-0318. The first one has # T-0317. This should be part...