Latest activity
-
StingrayOZ replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.It would need to be signed off by the Navy, the deputy PM and defence industry minister. That would be a variation, and cost more, and... -
d-ron84 reacted to Morgo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with
Like.
Sadly, we can’t have an HMAS Gillard given a certain PM gutted the proposed recapitalisation of the RAN. That 4th Hobart would be... -
d-ron84 reacted to old faithful's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Wow.
Names for Mogamis? How about the "silvertail class?" HMAS Eadie HMAS Krillich HMAS Menzies HMAS Troboiavic HMAS Stewart HMAS Randall...
-
VVolkodav reacted to Morgo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The sites being considered for the sub base are apparently Port Kembla, Newcastle and Brisbane. I personally thought Kembla made the...
-
VVolkodav reacted to Morgo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Sadly, we can’t have an HMAS Gillard given a certain PM gutted the proposed recapitalisation of the RAN. That 4th Hobart would be...
-
VVolkodav reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
TBH I would like the RAN to continue using/reusing ship's names and passing along the battle honours. One significant danger in naming...
-
spoz reacted to Morgo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The sites being considered for the sub base are apparently Port Kembla, Newcastle and Brisbane. I personally thought Kembla made the... -
spoz reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
I think you will agree that there is a significant increase in complexity in a vessel like a FFG vs. an OPV. Also the individual...
-
spoz reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
TBH I would like the RAN to continue using/reusing ship's names and passing along the battle honours. One significant danger in naming...
-
spoz reacted to JBRobbo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
Everyone knows this, what's your point? I figured Darwin, Melbourne & Perth will be the names of the future Hobart replacements so i...
-
Cadredave reacted to spoz's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
No, just, no. And yes, I know the story of each of them; it’s why I proposed some of those names for locations in certain Navy... -
Mark_Evans reacted to Morgo's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
The sites being considered for the sub base are apparently Port Kembla, Newcastle and Brisbane. I personally thought Kembla made the... -
Todjaeger replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.I think you will agree that there is a significant increase in complexity in a vessel like a FFG vs. an OPV. Also the individual... -
John Fedup reacted to Todjaeger's post in the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0 with Like.
TBH I would like the RAN to continue using/reusing ship's names and passing along the battle honours. One significant danger in naming... -
Todjaeger replied to the thread Royal Australian Navy Discussions and Updates 2.0.TBH I would like the RAN to continue using/reusing ship's names and passing along the battle honours. One significant danger in naming...