No it wasn't..For most of the war the Germans were normally at a numerical disadvantage. It is not a myth. To give you an example; I have just finished "From The Realm Of A Dying Sun : IV SS-Panzerkorps And The Battles For Warsaw, July- November 1994 [Volume 1]" [Nash]Most of the war it was literally the opposite
As the author makes clear: from primary source material; throughout the battles fought during this period this Korps faced the equivalent of 3-4 Soviet Corps, plus armoured brigades and other elements. I can also provide other sources. I'm no scholar or expert on the Gernan/Soviet war but I've long been able to differentiate the myths from the facts..
On Babarossa a " good chunk of the Soviet Army" was indeed in Siberia but it wasn't the main chunk and Soviet forces deployed in the Western regions on the eve of Barbarossa still had a numerical advantage over the Germans and their allies.
The "myth" was largely the result of memoirs and reports written by former German officers like Halder, Balck, Guderian, Mellenthin, etc; in the 1960's and 1970's at a time when there were hardly any Soviet/Russian sources available.It wasn't due to former officers who rewrote history when in the NVA.many generals in the new german army of the GDR had to cover the truth in the same fashion they created the "gentlemen war" myth of the Africa Korps and of course Erwin Romel figure
On North Africa it may not have been a "gentlemen's war" per see but compared to the war in the East and even to an extent the war in the West; it was relatively clean.
Indeed. The Germans massed armour at the point of contact instead of in penny packets. In 1940 the French actually had more armour but they were in penny packets.The Germans often had a number advantage locally because they had better recon and better ability to concentrate forces effectively.
Last edited: