Rob, we lurve you...REALLY !:argueGah! You guys are merciless! I say one little thing about it being torpedos, swiftly retract that and replace it with decoys ( + link) and I STILL get 2 replies telling me how I was wrong
The RN varient doesn't really need CRV-7s its getting LMM instead.Thanks guys!
I had a chat with the head of international exports for AugustaWestland today (University careers event) and I asked him about apparently the Wildcat can carry CRV-7 rockets + 20mm cannon according to their brochure, his reply wasn't surprising.
Basically it was "Well, currently there's no plan at all for ever mounting those weapons, they're basically a small option to showcase what we could put on it if we want" so don't expect any of those toys (mainly rockets I thought) on any Wildcats
We're using CRV-7 on Apache though - and I'd take HESIAP or whatever the "pink mist/instagib" variant is called any day of the week against a fast attack craft.The RN varient doesn't really need CRV-7s its getting LMM instead.
Defence Secretary Announces Further £350M For Successor Submarines| Royal NavyThis investment will sustain 1,200 UK jobs and makes clear the Government’s firm commitment to maintaining continuous at sea deterrence for future decades.
The funding follows the initial £350M of design work announced earlier this year.
This announcement comes as Philip Hammond visited the home of the UK’s nuclear deterrent at Faslane on the Clyde and follows the successful firing of an unarmed Trident ballistic missile by HMS Vigilant during a test launch in the Atlantic Ocean last week.
HMS Vigilant is one of four Vanguard Class submarines which maintain the UK’s nuclear deterrent and this firing, the first in three years, confirms the credibility of the deterrent.
The Vanguard submarines will be replaced from 2028 by the Successor which is currently being designed by British companies.
As a result of today’s announcement, BAE Systems will proceed with an additional £315M worth of work, with a further £38M at Babcock.
GoodPretty ticked off the LibDems.
The RN doesn't have CEC, although it has trialled the system - a decision to fit the kit to the T45's has been kicked out to 2015. The quicker the better as far as I'm concerned.Do the RN and,European navies have a capability similar to the USN's Cooperative Engagement Capability?
Definitely, constructing these subs will near enough last up to the point where contracts for Astute replacements will be being placed for the first few boats. If 2028 remains the due date for the first new boomer to be commissioned + ~2 year gap per following boat makes it to around 2034 and then considering the order for the first 3 Astutes was placed with GEC-Marconi about a decade before the first boat was launched, that'll be plenty of time.Good
I think Hammond explained it well enough, we've already suffered the weakening of design capability for nuclear submarines in this country with a long gap before the order for Astute. Putting some money on the table right now keeps that capability alive.
I read that the Type 26 won't incorporate CEC. Have they cut out more than fat in trying to get the costs down?The RN doesn't have CEC, although it has trialled the system - a decision to fit the kit to the T45's has been kicked out to 2015. The quicker the better as far as I'm concerned.
Its not in the core equipment budget but it hasn't been ruled out completely, the MOD has £8bn (I think) wiggle room over the next decade to order extra kitI read that the Type 26 won't incorporate CEC. Have they cut out more than fat in trying to get the costs down?
IMO well worth the money when funds are available down the road. No platform fights alone after all.Its not in the core equipment budget but it hasn't been ruled out completely, the MOD has £8bn (I think) wiggle room over the next decade to order extra kit
Type 23 definitely isn't getting CEC - Type 26 may (perhaps) get it. I think it's mandatory, far too useful to miss out on.I read that the Type 26 won't incorporate CEC. Have they cut out more than fat in trying to get the costs down?