Let's clear some things up.
The US Army is
not meant for "-Meant for Occupation, guarding etc". It is the primary land warfighting force of the United States, and provides the vast majority of combat troops.
And while the USMC does particpate heavily in both OIF and OEF, claiming that it " does most of the big engagements aginst the enemy" is completely incorrect,
The US Army has always done the vast majority of fighting in our Nation's wars, simply by virtue of being much larger.
The US Army (including it's reserve components) has over 1 million soldiers in boots, compared to ~250,000 active and reserve US Marines.
There are probably more combat troops (infantry, armor, artillery, cavalry, air defese, combat aviation, spec ops) in the US Army than there are Marines of any kind.
As an example, ~70% of US KIA in OIF have been suffered by the US Army, Army National Guard and Army Reserve.
This is true both today, and historically. In WW2, when there were 660,000 Marines (a bit more than double the amount today) there were 11
million soldiers in the US Army. This includes the Army Air Corps (since there was no Air Force yet), but there were 4-1/2 million US Army soldiers engaged in ground combat during the course of the war.
Guess how many Marines landed in North Africa, Sicilly, Italty, Normandy, or Southern France?
Zero.
This is not meant as a slight to the USMC, who certainly has alway been in the forefront of battle in our Nation's wars, but it is grossly incorrect, and bit insulting to imply that the US Army is only good for provding garrison soldiers and "gaurding".
The Marine Corps has a very specific role in the US Military - it provides the US with a small, but powerful rapid intervention force that can deploy combat power anywhere in the world (or at least anywhere within helicopter range of the ocean) on very short notice. It is something that the Marines are very good at, and should be justifiably proud of. They are NOT however, the United States primary land combat force. That role belongs to the US Army.
Both are excellent career choices, and the decision utlimately is one of personal preference.
Personally, I'm not a big fan of spending weeks floating around on a boat, so I picked the Army.
SSG Adrian Gunn
if you were drafted into the us military, which would you join?
i plan to join the marines so i would go into the marines
Army
except for rangers and SF)
-Better equipment
- quicker promotions
- Better SF
Marines
- does most of the big engagements aginst the enemy
- better training, smaller which means has a deeper pool of combat hardened nco's and officers
- Takes a long time to get promoted