Yes, I've been asked to behave OPSSG :nutkick It appears that our friendly moderators do not like points touching on local rivalries and politics. ANyway, it is a moot point, it was that Malayan Tunku who invited Singapore to leave the federation.
On to the main point, Malaysia is a resource, and export orientated Economy. The downturn will eventually affect the markets (companies) in the Far East, their economies will contract and you will continue to see this tomorrow at the local Hang Seng, KLSE amongst other bourses. This means we must be conservative in expenditure, but in all honesty, the real ethos of Malaysian politics has disappeared, leaving a leviathan in it's place, ossified in sturcture and behaviour. That just means we can't get rid of the local gravy trains that easily.
The Cougars were meant for the RMAF. It doesn't appear that this deal will follow through now, as Badawi is having second thoughts. ANyway, our Nuris still work, and if it ain't broke, don't replace it. I suppose we'll keep on flying this until common sense prevails and we concentrate on different cost effective products. The Mi 17 looks good as well as the CH47, but both were ruled out in the initial RFI stage. KL or shall we say Putrajaya may well have to revisit their decision.
The Thales deal is still going through as well as the AWACS. I would say that these two acquisitions are pivotal for our Armed Forces. It will change our outlook. I think Malaysia should buy less now. We just cannot afford to engage in a complete rearmament. We have Tanks, Frigates, Fighters, Submarines, Radars and soon, AWACs. Do we need more?
And anyway, China rearming is no news at all. It has ben ongoing in the last 20 years. I doubt if they need that much manpower, but if you're part of a country of 1 billion, i think the figures may appear entirely reasonable. The US is definitely going to stage a comeback in the SEA anytime now. The Phillipines is almost ripe for reinvestment and well, Singapore is friendly, but in all honesty, basing, temporary or permanent will be an issue. A rather short term issue.
For a developing country and at this day and age, the usage of sophisticated military equipment is a necessity. I don't think it's fair judgment to say that Malaysia has enough military equipment and she should spend less. If defence wasn't important, why would any country want to allocate as much as a few percentages of their respective GDPs to defence?
It's like computers. Conceptually, you have the cpu, the monitor and the mouse. It works but then you realise, maybe by upgrading your graphic cards, your processing speed etc., you may actually enhance the whole computing experience altogether.
Speaking of which, it's so hard to keep up to date with the current military changes man. But it'll be good if the AWAC deal goes through.