I'm 15 and was wondering if we could discuss what skills a great commander must posses, and what skills/attributes great commanders throughout history have had in common with one another. I am also wondering if I would make a good commander. I know that nothing in life really parallels actual troop command, but as far as strategy games go, I just don't really lose that often, and I figured these "war games" are the best thing I have to rely on to show skill when it comes to strategy, short of commanding actual forces.
I almost always win at chess. I often beat people twice my age very quickly. I can't explain it, but I just know what my opponent is going to do. It really pisses people off. Same goes for warfare based real-time strategy games for the PC, as well as the games Risk, Battleship, anything. I just...win. I almost always win. My friends call me "Ender" after the commander in the SciFi book series Ender's Game. They won't even try to play me anymore really, so I have to go online. I know these things are nothing like real combat, but they all involve resource allocation, quick thinking, anticipating the actions of your opponent, and most importantly, deception. I figure that if I posses an abnormal skill in these areas I have a better chance of being a good commander than someone who doesn't. Of course none of these things account for actual leadership ability as well as a dozen other things.
What do you guys think?
I almost always win at chess. I often beat people twice my age very quickly. I can't explain it, but I just know what my opponent is going to do. It really pisses people off. Same goes for warfare based real-time strategy games for the PC, as well as the games Risk, Battleship, anything. I just...win. I almost always win. My friends call me "Ender" after the commander in the SciFi book series Ender's Game. They won't even try to play me anymore really, so I have to go online. I know these things are nothing like real combat, but they all involve resource allocation, quick thinking, anticipating the actions of your opponent, and most importantly, deception. I figure that if I posses an abnormal skill in these areas I have a better chance of being a good commander than someone who doesn't. Of course none of these things account for actual leadership ability as well as a dozen other things.
What do you guys think?